It's been forgotten, but there were many conversations that J Kidd in his prime was the best player in the NBA.
No there weren't. Why lie?Facts
Real facilitator! The reason Iโm a NETS FAN

No there weren't. Why lie?
His best years were in Phoenix to 2006
You had Jordan, Duncan, Shaq and Kobe.
JKidd was an athletic menace at Cal and up until his time was up in Phoenix
We are clearly taking about the early 2000s.No there weren't. Why lie?
His best years were in Phoenix to 2006
You had Jordan, Duncan, Shaq and Kobe.
JKidd was an athletic menace at Cal and up until his time was up in Phoenix
No one ever said thatIt's been forgotten, but there were many conversations that J Kidd in his prime was the best player in the NBA.
Steve Nash won back-to-back MVPs, and no one said he was the best player in the NBA in that period.he literally finished second in mvp voting in 2001-2002
We are clearly taking about the early 2000s.
Steve Nash won back-to-back MVPs, and no one said he was the best player in the NBA.
I wanted him to get MVP the season that Duncan got it.It's been forgotten, but there were many conversations that J Kidd in his prime was the best player in the NBA.

And Jason Kidd never won an MVP. So what?steve nash never took a team to the finals, kidd did in back to back years
Kidd was arguably the best all-around player in the NBA in that Finals run tho, I remember it vividlyYes, in an NBA with Shaq, Duncan and Kobe. No one was putting Kidd in that class.
I was outside. I remember this. There is no reason to change history.
IDK what that even means. People used to say this about Pippen in the 90s, but when you stepped back, it meant nothing because there were at least five players better than peak Pippen, including his teammate. You could argue his Bay Area bredrin, Gary Payton, was a better all-around player because at least Payton could get you 20 ppg.Kidd was arguably the best all-around player in the NBA in that Finals run tho, I remember it vividly