Jason Whitlock: The Explication 2.0

Pesci

Architect
Joined
Dec 3, 2014
Messages
3,494
Reputation
-675
Daps
8,873
Jason Whitlock considers himself to be a really influential person. I love that he takes shots at Ta-Nehisi Coates, who is ten times the thinker and writer that Whitlock is.

Apparently black people aren't really liberals, either :ohhh:

I also liked when he vaguely called out other people for supporting neo-liberalism
 

keond

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
25,305
Reputation
12,015
Daps
212,051
Reppin
ATLANTA
Skimmed the article and i saw Malcolm X, The Wire, Obama and MLK name dropped. This fat c00n got fired and all the sudden he is some kind of black revolutionary. As someone said earlier he truly does overestimate his importance.
 

Spree At Last

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,406
Reputation
310
Daps
3,564
Jason Whitlock said:
We’ve been justifiably Democrats for more than 50 years. We’ve never really been liberals. There was a time when the Democratic party housed conservatives and liberals. Black Americans have long proudly held conservative values while also demanding government change.

this is just trash, blatantly misrepresenting the facts to make a terrible point. pre-1964, the democratic party did actually have both conservative and liberal members. this was when the republicans were actually the more progressive party (supported civil rights and more government), and the democrats were composed of two factions, one who were democrats only because lincoln was a republican (racist white southerners) and the other who were interested in helping the lower class (FDR-era progressive democrats, fairly similar to the republicans of the day in terms of goals). black dems were part of this second faction, and it was obvious that a split needed to happen. in 1964 the democrat LBJ passed the civil rights act, which made the southern cac dems (dixiecrats) angry. since they were a huge chunk of the population, they defected to the republican party, took control of it and ran a candidate for president who opposed the civil rights act... this led the progressive republicans coming over to the democratic party and basically created the current political landscape.

so yeah, the democratic party once housed conservatives (racist cacs) and liberals (progressives and minorities)... sounds like shytlock would like to go back to that era. :scusthov:
 

gho3st

plata or plomo
Joined
Oct 27, 2012
Messages
34,951
Reputation
2,990
Daps
84,445
Reppin
2016
Skimmed the article and i saw Malcolm X, The Wire, Obama and MLK name dropped. This fat c00n got fired and all the sudden he is some kind of black revolutionary. As someone said earlier he truly does overestimate his importance.
nah thats typical whitlock tho , can never stay on subject or refrain from drawing grandiose parallels :francis:.


And Coates is better than Whitlock, I'm not surprised Whitlock doesn't like him. :yeshrug:
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,127
Reputation
6,422
Daps
170,912
this is just trash, blatantly misrepresenting the facts to make a terrible point. pre-1964, the democratic party did actually have both conservative and liberal members. this was when the republicans were actually the more progressive party (supported civil rights and more government), and the democrats were composed of two factions, one who were democrats only because lincoln was a republican (racist white southerners) and the other who were interested in helping the lower class (FDR-era progressive democrats, fairly similar to the republicans of the day in terms of goals). black dems were part of this second faction, and it was obvious that a split needed to happen. in 1964 the democrat LBJ passed the civil rights act, which made the southern cac dems (dixiecrats) angry. since they were a huge chunk of the population, they defected to the republican party, took control of it and ran a candidate for president who opposed the civil rights act... this led the progressive republicans coming over to the democratic party and basically created the current political landscape.

so yeah, the democratic party once housed conservatives (racist cacs) and liberals (progressives and minorities)... sounds like shytlock would like to go back to that era. :scusthov:
This is the biggest problem with he who ate rib. He is so unqualified to speak on these things that he gets basic facts wrong. It's embarrassing.
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,127
Reputation
6,422
Daps
170,912
"The hostile, highly confrontational, “this ain’t your grandmama’s Civil Rights Movement” Black Lives Matter openly mocks Martin Luther King Jr.’s tactics and all but ignores Malcolm X’s spiritual journey. Black culture is being redefined as atheist and liberal. It has never been that. We’ve been justifiably Democrats for more than 50 years. We’ve never really been liberals. There was a time when the Democratic party housed conservatives and liberals."

In one paragraph he says its dangerous for black people to think one way, and then in another he says black people need to think one way.

Damn, he's gonna make me listen to that racist for 2 hours smh. Whitlock could've picked a better outlet.
no he couldnt. Cowherd is the perfect outlet for him to eat ribs in front of racist whites.
 
Top