He compared it to '92, and '96. Its pure comedy, but he has become our spokesman, even though he took put in destroying the culture.
Again, where does he say it's back in its prime?He said 92 and 96![]()

He compared it to '92, and '96. Its pure comedy, but he has become our spokesman, even though he took put in destroying the culture.
Again, where does he say it's back in its prime?He said 92 and 96![]()

i dont see how what he said makes him deserving of the brutal slay-fest that this thread is
i dont know you dont either, ur makin presumptions just like everyone does about celebrities an other pplBecause its insincere and it insults our intelligence. You think Jay-Z ever gave a shiit about race relations, for instance. I rather him focus on the art and be truthful for once.
He's had race and pro-black lyrics in his music since Reasonable Doubt, brehBecause its insincere and it insults our intelligence. You think Jay-Z ever gave a shiit about race relations, for instance. I rather him focus on the art and be truthful for once.

Again, where does he say it's back in its prime?![]()
"...will your response be "Pam Grier back in the day or right now
?"...its offensive regardless
Todays hip-hop is decent but the last really great year was maybe 2008 or even 2011 if you drop the bar a bit.
Breh, he said it feels like 92, 96 as far as "all the albums dropping". He didn't say the albums were on par with the classics from those years, just that there's a number of quality releases. He wasn't making any points about the overall state of the game or anything. The "hip hop back in its prime" part isn't his quote, that's from the article. I think he's still off cause there'd need to be a lot more quality albums coming out to really have the feel of 92 or 96, but he's not making the point the article is trying to say he's making.He didn't have to say he thinks those 2 yrs are the primes...but sumtimes u just don't need specefics...if a nikka say "Whoopi Goldberg lookin like Pam Grier"...will your response be "Pam Grier back in the day or right now
?"...its offensive regardless
![]()
Breh, he said it feels like 92, 96 as far as "all the albums dropping". He didn't say the albums were on par with the classics from those years, just that there's a number of quality releases. He wasn't making any points about the overall state of the game or anything. The "hip hop back in its prime" part isn't his quote, that's from the article. I think he's still off cause there'd need to be a lot more quality albums coming out to really have the feel of 92 or 96, but he's not making the point the article is trying to say he's making.
Personally, 2006 is the closest year in recent memory to 92 and 96 as far as quantity of good albums:
Lupe Fiasco - Food & Liquor
The Roots - Game Theory
Ghostface Killah - Fishscale
Gnarls Barkley - St. Elsewhere
Clipse - Hell Hath No Fury
Dilla - Donuts
The Game - Doctor's Advocate
Nas - Hip Hop is Dead
Method Man - 4:21...The Day After
Snoop Dogg - Tha Blue Carpet Treatment
Young Jeezy - The Inspiration
T.I - King
Ludacris - Release Therapy
Busta Rhymes - Big Bang
Dilla - The Shining
Outkast - Idlewild


They're the mainstream dudes putting out quality, also jay has said point blank you gotta prove yourself and be at a certain level to get his co-sign publicly, there are prolly a few more dudes just coming up or on the tier below drake/cole/etc but he doesn't feel they deserve his co-sign yetjay keeps mentioning the same guys in all his interviews now its getting boring, drake, j cole, kanye, wale, kendrick