Jehreh might regret lowballing Demarco Murray.

philmonroe

Superstar
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
28,909
Reputation
730
Daps
37,473
Reppin
The 215
I question your reading comprehension. You stay misinterpreting the points that cowboys fans in this forum are trying to make.

Boy i been watching the Cowboys since 98. Im fukking almost 30. I witness the hambrick transition from spell back to starter and i remember what ppl was saying when he was spelling emmitt in his final season. Hambrick had a great ypc average in his backup duties just like randle does and ppl were calling for him to get more carries and when he did get more carries in then role as a starter he failed miserably. Randle has the benefit of running against a usually exhausted defense after murray dine worn them down.

And who brought up anything about dunbar being a main back. My point was all about my doubts about our running game being as sucessful with them two spearheading the running back by committee as opposed to to Murray being the feature back in our offense again.

Point black, I prefer Murray back at a good deal. Our offensive line may be godly but I'm skeptical at the idea that you can just plug any running back in their and get similar results to Murray's output, let alone better results.
I don't stay misinterpreting shyt sometimes y'all say dumb shyt and probably think the same of me. I'm ok with that we don't have to agree but I'm going to call out the stupid shyt and y'all can do the same to me. You said Randle was like Hambrick or not nikka? Just because that happened with one person don't mean its going to be the same with the next that's why it sounds stupid. If you knew anything about football you'd know they wasn't going to have Dunbar as a main dude that's why I mentioned you mentioning dude like it was just going to be them two period. He is always going to be our change of pace back. If Murray is gone you really think them two are going to be the only two on the team? Smarten up Nas. We don't know one way or another but being a scarred ass nikka ain't going to ever help you do shyt. If he goes I have faith that the way we going with the draft recently we will be alright and if we not it won't take long before it gets right.

Also how you 30 and just started rooting for the team at 13?
 

who_better_than_me

Time to go!!
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
27,611
Reputation
1,340
Daps
41,729
Reppin
NULL
I don't stay misinterpreting shyt sometimes y'all say dumb shyt and probably think the same of me. I'm ok with that we don't have to agree but I'm going to call out the stupid shyt and y'all can do the same to me. You said Randle was like Hambrick or not nikka? Just because that happened with one person don't mean its going to be the same with the next that's why it sounds stupid. If you knew anything about football you'd know they wasn't going to have Dunbar as a main dude that's why I mentioned you mentioning dude like it was just going to be them two period. He is always going to be our change of pace back. If Murray is gone you really think them two are going to be the only two on the team? Smarten up Nas. We don't know one way or another but being a scarred ass nikka ain't going to ever help you do shyt. If he goes I have faith that the way we going with the draft recently we will be alright and if we not it won't take long before it gets right.

Also how you 30 and just started rooting for the team at 13?
Randle is NOTHING like Hambrick. The comparison does not match. Again, 4 year 24 million is fine. Anything more and bye bye.
I'm comparing the situation. Bith were backups who had good years and ppl noticed and wanted them timget more carries.

Im just not a fan of the running back by committee. Our great franchise has always been more successful with a featute back. Murray is capable of 1500+ and 10+ tds and we need a fukking productive running game for our offense and romo to be sucessful.

Murray was a an all around good back who did it all.
 

Spade

Superstar
Joined
Sep 14, 2012
Messages
14,575
Reputation
935
Daps
25,953
Reppin
DC/Texas/Chicago
I'm comparing the situation. Bith were backups who had good years and ppl noticed and wanted them timget more carries.

Im just not a fan of the running back by committee. Our great franchise has always been more successful with a featute back. Murray is capable of 1500+ and 10+ tds and we need a fukking productive running game for our offense and romo to be sucessful.

Murray was a an all around good back who did it all.
We don't have to do a RBC. But expecting a back to duplicate what he did this past season is not realistic.
 

MegaTronBomb!

Power is in my hair nikka
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,332
Reputation
2,595
Daps
44,741
Reppin
From The Westside With Love
So RB is going to be the only position in sports that doesn't pat you based on padt performances?

RB position needs a minimum wage if you have the most carries on the team and go for there.

The NFLPA can't let this position get exploited like that

Jason Garrett goof ass just got an extension off the back of Murray

We understand the shelf life on RB's is very different from every other position on the field... and that it's the easiest position to transition from college to the NFL.


add to that, considering this years carries...and how all the backs that were at that number, and past it.... all visibly broke down within the next 2-3 seasons, why would they offer him a huge contract?


besides, you're only worth what you can get a team to pay you....there is somebody out there who might overpay for him, but it's probably not gonna be Jerruh Jones
 
Top