Jeremy Corbyn is fracturing the UK Labour Party with his defenses of Russia over Skripal poisoning

☑

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,087
Reputation
-34,036
Daps
611,638
Reppin
The Deep State
he was an MP and there was rumors that came out from declassified Communist Czech spy files:

Jeremy Corbyn Was a Communist Spy

Corbyn, the spy and the cold war’s long shadow

www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43168245

Jeremy Corbyn says his records disprove 'communist spy' claim

Jeremy Corbyn and the Czech spy: the secret files





Jeremy Corbyn Has Doubts About Russia's Link to Ex-Spy Poisoning
More stories by Alex MoralesMarch 14, 2018, 12:53 PM EDT

Jeremy Corbyn’s Russia problem just got worse.

Long at the far left of British politics, the opposition leader misjudged the mood of lawmakers -- including from his own Labour Party -- by casting doubt on Russian government involvement in the poisoning of a former spy on U.K. soil.

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Theresa May listed a slew of measures the U.K. will take against Russia for the attack more than a week ago in western England, including the expulsion of 23 diplomats. Sergei Skripal and his daughter, she said, were poisoned by a nerve agent developed by Russia.

Corbyn then stood up to “echo” her words of support for emergency services -- but noticeably failed to back her condemnation of Russia. He suggested nothing was yet proven, and asked May if it was possible that Russia lost control of the nerve agent rather than deploying it itself. His request to know how she responded to a Russian demand for a sample so they could carry out their own tests sparked howls of disapproval from lawmakers.

Corbyn’s spokesman later told reporters that his record on international crises is bettered by no lawmaker in Parliament. He said the U.K. has a history of intelligence mistakes, including on weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and called for the government to act only on the basis of evidence -- pointing out that Corbyn had also received security briefings.

May was still taking lawmakers’ questions when she was asked about that statement. “Wrong and outrageous,” she called it.

Political Leanings
While Corbyn did say a “robust dialogue” was needed with Russia, his stance sits uneasily with his past left-wing activities, and comes just weeks after the papers were filled with reports -- denied by the Labour leader -- that he fed intelligence to a Czech agent in the 1980s.

Corbyn had similarly misjudged the mood on Monday when May first pointed the finger at Russia, giving President Vladimir Putin 24 hours to explain how the nerve agent came to be used in Britain. The Labour leader chose to direct his ire at May’s Conservative Party, who he said accepted more than 800,000 pounds ($1.1 million) in donations from Russian oligarchs.

On Wednesday, it was left to Yvette Cooper -- beaten to the Labour leadership by Corbyn in 2015 and now chairwoman of Parliament’s Home Affairs Committee -- to speak for moderate Labour lawmakers.

The prime minister’s “conclusion about the culpability of the Russian state is an immensely serious one, and that, in addition to their breaches of international law, the use of chemical weapons, but also their continued disregard for the rule of the law and for human rights must be met with unequivocal condemnation,” Cooper said, to near universal approval.

— With assistance by Jess Shankleman
 
Last edited:
☑

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Hall of Shame
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
302,087
Reputation
-34,036
Daps
611,638
Reppin
The Deep State


This is the SECOND day in a row:mindblown:

Jeremy Corbyn under fire over response to PM's Russia statement

Jeremy Corbyn under fire over response to PM's Russia statement
Labour leader’s spokesman intensifies row by seeming to compare Salisbury case to Iraq
Heather StewartWed 14 Mar 2018 15.50 GMT
Jeremy Corbyn came under sustained attack, including from MPs on his own side, over his response to the prime minister’s statement on Russia in which he failed to condemn the Kremlin directly for carrying out the Salisbury attack.

The Labour leader called the Salisbury incident “an appalling act of violence”, saying on Wednesday: “Nerve agents are abominable if used in any war. It is utterly reckless to use them in a civilian environment.”

But he left open the possibility – as May herself did on Monday – that the nerve agent could have been used by someone else other than the Russian state.

His comments brought shouts of “shame” from the Conservative benches.

The row later intensified when Corbyn’s spokesman, Seumas Milne, appeared to compare the intelligence about the Salisbury attack to the false reports of weapons of mass destruction that provided the case to go to war in Iraq.

Briefing journalists as the debate continued in the House of Commons, Milne underlined the “problematic” role of intelligence in the past.

“I think obviously the government has access to information and intelligence on this matter which others don’t; however, also there’s a history in relation to WMD and intelligence which is problematic to put it mildly.

So I think the right approach is to seek the evidence; to follow international treaties, particularly in relation to prohibited chemical weapons, because this was a chemical weapons attack, carried out on British soil. There are procedures that need to be followed in relation to that.

Milne, a former Guardian columnist and associate editor, added: “In relation to the second alternative explanation, in other words the loss of control of military grade nerve agent, we highlighted today and we have done repeatedly, the dangers of Mafia-like groups and oligarchic interests in London, and their links with elements within the Russian state, and that we need to take more firm action on that.”

With the briefing still continuing, Milne’s remarks about the use of intelligence were relayed back to the chamber by the Tory MP Alec Shelbrooke, who asked May about them.

The prime minister said she was “surprised and shocked by the spokesman for the leader of the opposition”.

She added: “It is very clear by the remarks that have been made by the backbenchers of the Labour party that they will be equally concerned about that remark, they stand full-square behind the government in the analysis that we’ve shown and the action we have taken.”

Meanwhile, a string of Labour MPs in the House of Commons stood up to offer their unequivocal backing to the prime minister – and by implication criticise what they regarded as Corbyn’s limp response.

'They have just one week to leave': May expels 23 Russian diplomats – video
Corbyn had stressed the need to gather evidence and abide by international law, underlining the role of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), based in The Hague.

He said: “If the government believes that it is still a possibility that Russianegligently lost control of a military-grade nerve agent, what action is being taken through the OPCW with our allies?”

Corbyn then asked: “How has she responded to the Russian government’s request for a sample of the agent used in the Salisbury attack, to run its own tests?”

May attacked Corbyn, saying the Russians had already been given the chance to explain where the nerve agent had come from and that the government had sought consensus.

“I am only sorry that the consensus does not go as far as the right honourable gentleman, who could have taken the opportunity as the UK government has done to condemn the culpability of the Russian state,” she said.

Labour backbenchers, including Yvette Cooper, Ben Bradshaw and Hilary Benn, offered their backing to May, in what appeared to be pointed responses to Corbyn’s stance.

Cooper, the chair of the home affairs select committee, was greeted with loud cheers when she said the UK government’s conclusion about Russian state involvement “should be met with unequivocal condemnation”.

May thanked Cooper and, in another remark aimed at Corbyn, said: “I know it is representative of many of her friends on the backbenches opposite.”

Bradshaw, a former cabinet minister, said: “Can I assure the prime minister that most of us on these benches fully support the measures that she has announced, and indeed some of us think they could have come a bit sooner.”

Another Labour MP, Chris Bryant, said he “completely supports everything the prime minister has said today” and that Putin’s Russia was “keeping his people poor and kills its political opponents”.

Sammy Wilson of the Democratic Unionist party described Corbyn’s cautious stance as “appeasement”.

Several Labour MPs, including John Woodcock, Wes Streeting and Chuka Umunna, later signed an early day motion – effectively a petition laid before parliament – the text of which said: “This house unequivocally accepts the Russian state’s culpability for the poisoning of Yulia and Sergey Skripal”.

Referring to Milne’s remarks, one furious backbencher who did not want to be named said: “Putin’s constant and shameful apologist might just as well stand aside and let the Russian ambassador write the speeches and brief the media himself.”


@DonKnock @dza @88m3 @wire28 @smitty22 @fact @Hood Critic @ExodusNirvana @Blessed Is the Man @dtownreppin214 @JKFrazier @tmonster @BigMoneyGrip @Soymuscle Mike @.r. @Dorian Breh @Dameon Farrow @TheNig @VR Tripper @re'up @Blackfyre_Berserker @Cali_livin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top