Joe Biden stands firmly with the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict…. OUR SYSTEM WORKS!

[mobbinfms]

This isn’t “cac on cac” problems. They just set the legal precedent that white people from all over the country can storm black protests and kill people indiscriminately and won’t even get a weapon possession charge.

That’s not how legal precedent is set. This is a state trial court in Wisconsin applying that state’s law. It doesn’t apply anywhere else in the country and the case hasn’t even gone to an appellate level where precedent can be set for Wisconsin.

 

[mobbinfms]

if the victims were black he would be a millionaire ALL-American hero by now.

The crazy shyt is, this piece of shyt already is an All-American hero. He has internship offers from Gaetz and Cawthorn. Crazy times we are living in.

 

[mobbinfms]

He could have said “although many people disagree with the verdict, the justice system has made its decision and WE must stand by their decision.”

But no, he said EYE stand by the verdict. This is the president. Every word he speaks/writes is intentional.

The fact that you said he’s taking a shot at MAGA shows you don’t know anything. The MAGA crowd is applauding this verdict and so is their idol Donald trump who just put out a statement almost verbatim what Biden said. How is a open white supremacist and race agitator literally saying the exact same thing but when Biden says it he’s being neutral?

Trump congratulated Rittenhouse. Biden said the verdict made him angry and concerned. How is that the exact same thing?

 

[Tribal Outkast]

It is causing friction. All he had to do was say nothing. He went out of his way to say he stands by the verdict. I believe rittenhouse legally got away with the murder charges but there’s no way he should have escaped the weapon possession charges so I don’t stand by the verdict. Not to mention the biased judge.

You can’t compare trump literally telling his white supremacist mob to storm the capital to protestors showing civil disobedience and making the city pay economically for their unjust verdict. That was a flagrant disingenuous comparison.

He was going to get it no matter what happened

 

[that guy]

So if the intent of his comments was to dog whistle to white supremacists (a voting bloc that is never going to support him, but that’s another issue) that he secretly agrees with the verdict, why did he say “we have to abide by the verdict” and that the verdict left him feeling angry and concerned? Wouldn’t those direct statements of disapproval of the verdict cancel out the dog whistle?
Isn’t the far more likely scenario that he’s saying that he doesn’t personally like or agree with verdict, but this is our justice system, that he supports, so we have to abide by the verdict, whether we like it or not?

What do you mean they won’t vote for him? You’re implying white people are not white supremacist just because they are Democrats? Also, you know what a swing state is. You know the same white people that are liberal Democrats one election cycle and then conservative republicans the next.

If he personally disagreed with the verdict he would say that. He said he personally agreed with the verdict when he said “I stand by the verdict” We’re talking about Jim Crow joe after all.

They’re not direct statements of disapproval. When he says “I stand by the verdict” that’s a dog whistle to all prejudice white Americans who eagerly awaited the verdict. When he says “we have to abide by the verdict” he’s speaking to the black people that they thought would riot/ be in an uproar over that verdict. Two different statements for two different audiences.

 

[that guy]

He was going to get it no matter what happened

So why do black people have to get the short end of the stick? Especially when we’re the ones that put him in office.

 

[Tribal Outkast]

Im agreeing with you about why he was there I just wanted to point out the white people at BLM protest are usually there just to cause chaos and disorder. That’s the whole ironic thing about this case. He came there to shoot “black looters” but he shot three “looters” and all of them were white.

IMO, this case disproved the white media narrative that black people are the looters and rioters.

That’s the crazy thing about this whole case. I’ve been to many protests and the white folks that be out there looking weird get pointed out with the quickness. White dudes getting caught trying to break windows and all kinds of shyt on some throw stones and hide your hands shyt. I just say that you can avoid that shyt just by staying home. If you got to go to a protest with a big ass gun.. what’s the point? It’s unfortunate that he got away with all that shyt but it is what it is at this point. We all know what it is right now. I’ve literally seen people get sprayed with pepper spray, shot by teargas, tackled, etc and they only had phones in their hands. Hell I got shot in the ass by pepper bullets whole running away cause the cops was just tired of people being in their faces I guess.

 

[Cowboyz89]

Theres a lot of real things to criticize Biden for.
You dont have to reach like this.
People are purposefully arguing in bad faith about what he said.
This forum has become ridiculous.

 

[franknitty711]

I think the media pretty much picked the wrong incident to polarize. No way this was going any other way in Kenosha.

Biden administration in trouble - they used this incident to bash Trump is the evil of all evils'.

 

[Tribal Outkast]

So why do black people have to get the short end of the stick? Especially when we’re the ones that put him in office.

Bro I’m not calling for that man. I just said he’s doing what he’s doing to try to play it safe. People aren’t going to like what he says regardless… Also he’s not going to get up there and talk like people on Twitter. His statement means nothing to me at all honestly because it’s not going to change the verdict. That’s the most important thing on this whole shyt. I don’t care about these peoples reactions.

 

[that guy]

Theres a lot of real things to criticize Biden for.
You dont have to reach like this.
People are purposefully arguing in bad faith about what he said.
This forum has become ridiculous.

So you think if joe Biden was president during the OJ trial and Twitter was around he would get on his soapbox and say “I stand with the verdict”?

 

[that guy]

That’s not how legal precedent is set. This is a state trial court in Wisconsin applying that state’s law. It doesn’t apply anywhere else in the country and the case hasn’t even gone to an appellate level where precedent can be set for Wisconsin.

First of all it’s called case law and that’s exactly how legal precedence works, and you’re jumping to another state just to try to prove a point when you can have another Kyle rittenhouse situation right there in Wisconsin again.

Thats is also how a legal precedence works because this a trial by jury that is national news so when a jury in another state with stand your ground laws is deliberating on a similar case, this case will be in the back of their minds and influence their decisions. If another white kid decides to go to a black protest to provoke protestors so that he’ll can finally use his new toy (AR-15) they will think “if Kyle rittenhouse was innocent then so is this person.” and don’t dare say they are only supposed to use the facts in the case because this is America and the only rules that apply are “I’m white and I say so”

 

[Lakerman0834]

hilarious the poster whi keeps making #bothside threads disappears

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I’m liking this new kamala that’s not calculating every move. They’re letting her off the hook and it shows

 

[GPBear]

I don’t care because the victims were white How dare Biden say such a thing


TLRepublicans having a lotta cognitive dissonance recently