Joe getting too old for this shyt he needs to retire and enjoy his life. Obviously government backed health insurance will mean increase in taxes for all businesses. You have to be down right stupid to think that money will come out of thin air. There's a reason republicans have been resisting "free" healthcare forever.
In my opinion there will be less abuse in the system if we have a free for all. Doctor's can't just charge whatever rate they want. Government will come up with the prices and it will basically be a take it or leave it situation. However i can definitely see hospitals cutting costs in other ways for example by hiring less doctors/nurses and making you wait much longer for a procedure. This is the downside of free for all. But the rich always have options by getting instant treatment in other countries.The question though is: will higher taxes actually mean higher costs? I think the answer is no. I think.
In my opinion there will be less abuse in the system if we have a free for all. Doctor's can't just charge whatever rate they want. Government will come up with the prices and it will basically be a take it or leave it situation. However i can definitely see hospitals cutting costs in other ways for example by hiring less doctors/nurses and making you wait much longer for a procedure. This is the downside of free for all. But the rich always have options by getting instant treatment in other countries.
I think that can be handled by regulations. The gov't can see what the average wait time is for a doctor's appointment, specialist's appointment, minor or major surgery and based regulations on them. That way they can tell hospitals have to have a fully staffed hospital or urgent care without explicitly telling them.
In my opinion there will be less abuse in the system if we have a free for all. Doctor's can't just charge whatever rate they want. Government will come up with the prices and it will basically be a take it or leave it situation. However i can definitely see hospitals cutting costs in other ways for example by hiring less doctors/nurses and making you wait much longer for a procedure. This is the downside of free for all. But the rich always have options by getting instant treatment in other countries.
breh, to say that you're vastly overestimating the government doesn't begin to touch the phrase "understatement"I think that can be handled by regulations. The gov't can see what the average wait time is for a doctor's appointment, specialist's appointment, minor or major surgery and based regulations on them. That way they can tell hospitals have to have a fully staffed hospital or urgent care without explicitly telling them.