John Deere doubles wage increases, boosts retirement benefits in second offer to striking UAW worker

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
69,123
Reputation
10,597
Daps
186,811
John Deere doubles wage increases, boosts retirement benefits in second offer to striking UAW workers


Tyler Jett
Des Moines Register
Published: 4:39 p.m. CT Oct. 31, 2021 Updated: 5:06 p.m. CT Oct. 31, 2021


785ca9ce-a84d-4161-9826-96f9de29ef01-20211015_UAWstrike_01453.JPG



In its latest offer, Deere & Co. executives doubled wage increases and boosted future retirement payments for United Auto Workers members.

An outline of a new contract between the company and the union released Sunday afternoon shows that 10,100 striking UAW members will receive 10% wage increases, compared to what they made earlier this year. That's up from a 5% or 6% increase that Deere offered in an earlier proposal, which nine out of 10 union members rejected Oct. 10.

The company will also continue its pension program for new hires, which Deere was going to cut under the prior agreement. And, compared to that agreement, the new proposal pays a higher rate for future retired workers. A 25-year employee would see an extra $150 a month.

The company also added lump sum payments that can reach six figures for future retired employees.

Chris Laursen, a 19-year painter at Deere's Ottumwa plant and the former UAW Local 74 president, said he expects to vote in favor of the contract after rejecting the Oct. 10 proposal.

"It's a hell of a lot better than what (the union) got us the first time," he said. "After two weeks-plus of strikes, we definitely made some gains on this."

The UAW's members will vote on the contract at 10 a.m. Tuesday. Union leaders said in a statement that Deere workers will remain on strike at least through the contract ratification.

The contract represents workers at 12 Deere locations in Illinois, Iowa and Kansas. The Iowa plants include factories in Ankeny, Davenport, Dubuque, Ottumwa and Waterloo. The UAW also represents Deere workers in Colorado and Georgia under a separate contract.

The strike, which began Oct. 14, is the first that the UAW has called against Deere since 1986. The action came as the company celebrates record profits, with executives expecting Deere to earn $5.7 billion to $5.9 billion for the fiscal year that ends Monday. CEO John May's pay increased 160% in 2020, to $15.6 million.

20824fbb-d4cc-406b-bc3b-d2f7d7724a89-John_C_May.jpg


At the same time, several UAW members said they felt the company owed them big raises after they worked through the COVID-19 pandemic, with executives telling them they were "essential" employees. The strike also comes as Deere and other manufacturers struggle to find enough workers.

The lowest level Deere employees covered in the contract, such as foundry product, would see their hourly wages immediately increase from $20.12 to $22.13. The highest level workers, such as electricians, would see hourly wages rise from $30.04 to $33.05.

The company will also give workers 5% raises in 2023 and 2025, and Deere will reinstate quarterly cost of living adjustments that workers lost in their 2015 contract. Overall, UAW officials expect that workers will see a 30% increase in wages from the beginning of this year through 2027, when the contract ends.



The contract also promises lump sum payments to workers when they retire. Employees who stay with the company for 10 to 24 years will get $37,500. Workers who stay at least 25 years will get $50,000.

In addition, Deere agreed to put another five-figure sum in an account for workers when they retire. If workers approve the new contract, the company will give employees an extra $2,000 for each year they've worked at the company. A 25-year worker will see an extra $50,000.

Laursen, the Ottumwa worker, said Deere told union officials this is their "last, best offer." If workers reject the contract, he said the company has informed the union they won't be back at the table for several months.

636041884483860283-Chris-Laursen.jpg


"That's a scare tactic," Laursen said. "I can’t see them going without production for four or five month. Maybe they’ll bring in (nonunion workers) from down south. It’s a big enough (expletive) show when we’re in there, and we know what we’re doing."

Dave Schmelzer, a 24-year quality control inspector in Milan and former UAW Local 79 chair, said he expects to vote for the contract after rejecting the last one. The boosted retirement benefits sold him.



He said he is worried the majority of members will reject the contract Tuesday, though. He believes some workers think Deere executives will put forth another, better offer. He pointed out workers are currently taking a pay cut, receiving $275 a week while on strike. He doesn't know how long they will be able to stay strong if the strike stretches through the end of this year.

976b1c7c-c3a7-42ab-b4f7-58a92c43c513-20211015_UAWstrike_01452.JPG

Members of the United Auto Workers strike outside of the John Deere Engine Works plant on Ridgeway Avenue in Waterloo, Iowa, on Friday, Oct. 15, 2021. About 10,000 UAW workers have gone on strike against John Deere since Oct. 14 at plants in Iowa, Illinois and Kansas.

"There's no guarantees that you get more if you just keep striking," he said. "There's a substantial loss for striking for three, four months. You can’t get that back. You can't work at a high enough hourly rate to chip away on that loss. It's just gone."

Jon Root, a 16-year assembler in Waterloo, said he still plans to reject the new contract Tuesday. He said Deere can afford to pay higher wages than what executives offered.

Root said he knows cashiers who make as much as some workers at the factory. He has circulated a petition among UAW members, demanding across-the-board, $10-an-hour pay raises. That would come out to hikes of 33% to 50%.

"The whole country is looking to us to set the new standard for skilled assembly labor," he said.

UPDATE 11/18/2021
John Deere doubles wage increases, boosts retirement benefits in second offer to striking UAW worker
 
Last edited:

Goat poster

KANG LIFE
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
20,423
Reputation
3,839
Daps
89,544
I’m glad some unions still have pull because a balance is always needed.

the only problem I have is when they don’t know a good deal when they see one and get kind of greedy.

Some are already saying they will reject this offer and ask for more :francis:


They better look into what happened to the Air Traffic Control union(PATCO) in the 80’s when they kept rejecting fair deals to try to get EVERYTHING they demanded.

Reagan literally destroyed them eventually

Negotiations usually meet somewhere in the middle unless one has a ridiculous amount of leverage.
 

RARI_Godwind

St. BAWGustine - DarkSkxxxn
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
9,583
Reputation
3,041
Daps
40,543
Double wages increase makes it sound like they’re doubling their hourly rate when in fact they’re doubling a percentage increase they think is reasonable for their employees that were already clearly asking for way more :dahell:

$2 an hour is a $4,000 increase a year
$3 is $6,000 a year.
Sounds good and simple but taxes are going to eat that up and the workers are left in near identical conditions as before.

Company makes BILLIONS and I doubt that is all overhead and pay stubs. CEO pay went up 160% when his workers went on strike!? :dahell: Let them come through saying he can only get a 5-10% increase and the workers get a 160% and see how fukking fast he’ll leave the company. FOH this is bullsht. Unionization WILL be the biggest political issue of the decade and the unions will win if they don’t settle for bullsht like this.
 

Heretic

GOLDGANG...
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
24,687
Reputation
7,312
Daps
71,106
Reppin
Alabama
I don't get why these companies won't pay their people, all they're going to do is increase their prices so that the company won't absorb the loss.
 

RARI_Godwind

St. BAWGustine - DarkSkxxxn
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
9,583
Reputation
3,041
Daps
40,543

What’s crazy is if the company’s returned to that ratio there would be no problem but CEOs would never accept and cry, throwing those same millions at congressmen to ring the commie alarm smh :snoop:
 
Top