Elim Garak
Veteran
If you play at a MVP level all season and don't play well when it counts the most. That means that MVP didn't mean shyt. What's flawed about that logic?It's very flawed logic...
If you play at a MVP level all season and don't play well when it counts the most. That means that MVP didn't mean shyt. What's flawed about that logic?It's very flawed logic...
The MVP is a regular season award, that's what's flawed about the logic. Otherwise the votes would be collected in July, not April. There's many factors into why a MVP player doesn't look the part for any given series. Habitual chokers/shrinkers are a different story.If you play at a MVP level all season and don't play well when it counts the most. That means that MVP didn't mean shyt. What's flawed about that logic?
Nothing flawed about it. I didn't say he is not deserving of the award or that it is based on playoff performance.The MVP is a regular season award, that's what's flawed about the logic. Otherwise the votes would be collected in July, not April. There's many factors into why a MVP player doesn't look the part for any given series. Habitual chokers/shrinkers are a different story.
Nash part 2
Everything is flawed about it. You not staying something verbatim does not get you off the hook for what your sentiment actually is. You clearly believe the award should be based on playoff performance if you use a subpar playoff performance to diminish the validity of the season MVP winner as an individual.Nothing flawed about it. I didn't say he is not deserving of the award or that it is based on playoff performance.
The fact that you have to play a minimum amount of games to get this award is going to be how they justify giving him 4 more mvpsThe crazy thing is that usually after the 3rd MVP, the voters tend to cool it down a bit going forward but the way it's shaping up I wouldn't be surprised if the unprecedented happens and he wins it the next two seasons.
I say this because the sport journalists and media personnel loves this man soo much that like you said they're gonna jump through hoops looking for reasons to justify him winning the MVP over and over again.
No way should this man ever have more MVPs than MJ, Kareem, Bron, Wilt, or Magic but it seems like the league trynna make him the “face” with all these MVPs. Obviously MVPs don't tell the whole story about a player but decades from now when new generations look back and see him with all these MVPs it allows for revisionists to rewrite NBA history, having people think Jokic was better than those names.
Legit surprised he didn't win. NBA been pushing him this year, although he got the personality of drying wall paper.
SGA WAS ROBBED
AVERAGE 30 ON ELITE EFFICIENCY
AS A GUARD ON THE NUMBER 1 SEED.
Jokic is not ending his career with no 7 damn MVPsThe fact that you have to play a minimum amount of games to get this award is going to be how they justify giving him 4 more mvps![]()
"Where's Jamal Murray at? Because I wanna talk to the man of the house""Jokic just opened his mouth, somebody give him a Grammy right now"
Russell's league era and his team was a unique circumstance that literally can't be replicated. Magic and Kareem are 2 Top 10ers (really 5ers) who played together for 10 years, that's also unique.It's gonna be really telling if Jokic doesn't get to at least 4-5 Finals.. Look at all the players who have at least 3:
Kareem (10 Finals)
Jordan (6 Finals)
LeBron (10 Finals)
Russell (12 Finals)
Larry Bird (5 Finals)
Wilt Chamberlain (6 Finals)
Magic (9 Finals)
3 MVPs is in elite company so yeah you better produce legacy wiseRussell's league era and his team was a unique circumstance that literally can't be replicated. Magic and Kareem are 2 Top 10ers (really 5ers) who played together for 10 years, that's also unique.
I could nitpick one more but I don't wanna hear the Coli crying so the rest is give you.