JT unintentionally showing you how much of a sham the Streaming Era is

ThiefyPoo

Trill
Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
27,815
Reputation
6,134
Daps
63,967
You can tell these chicks are about to be really down bad soon. Not just her, the other City Girl too. If they can't secure more sugar daddies it's over because this music shyt is OVER for them.
JT building her fan base up I think she will be ok .

She basically starting from the bottom .

Right now she on a promo club tour .




She grinding so :manny:
 

ThiefyPoo

Trill
Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
27,815
Reputation
6,134
Daps
63,967
Her "fanbase" is pretty much a bunch of chronically online performative gays who don't actually pay for her music or sell out shows.
She selling out same venues offset had to cancel I think she aite for now .

Just gotta keep working her music till she gets up there solo .
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
104,347
Reputation
14,079
Daps
246,405
Advertisers subsidize the music industry. The point now is to pay the artist for exposing his fans to ads not the artist selling copies of his trash ass album.

How many people paid to download or buy a physical copy of your album. That's u nihk.

But if the artist is going to pimp himself out to advertisers they may as well get a taste.
 
Last edited:

Uno

Superstar
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,185
Reputation
256
Daps
24,327
You can tell these chicks are about to be really down bad soon. Not just her, the other City Girl too. If they can't secure more sugar daddies it's over because this music shyt is OVER for them.

nah, I think JT has a hit with her new song.
 

JustCKing

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
26,072
Reputation
4,200
Daps
49,779
Reppin
NULL
And this is why peope need to stop makong comparisons to CD sales. It isn't the same. The industry should just stop trying to equate streams to sales because it isn't the same. Everything should be converted to streams and not the other way around. Ain't no way you could accurately say an album or song being played X amount of times is the same as a record sale. It doesn't make sense. I don't understand why the industry has such a hard to time with moving on when its clear music consumption has moved on from purchasing a physical album or even a digital download. Any physical music sell should be converted to streaming numbers and not sales equivalent. It looks stupid to say an artist sold 1M sales equivalent units when like 80% of that figure is because they converted the streaming numbers to sales. Then you have people thinking that if the same album dropped in the CD era, it would've been diamond in a week. No it wouldn't have. We also need to stop comparing streaming numbers to numbers from decades ago when physical copies were actually selling millions.

Bottom line they created the "sales equivalent" idea because people stopped buying music and the actual sales looked terrible beginning in 2014 where only one album sold a million copies and it was a Taylor Swift album.
 

Fani Willis fan

Christian Nationalist
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
20,415
Reputation
2,878
Daps
82,650
This is the Larry Holmes declaration, not that her music ever did huge numbers to begin with
:francis:
 

Long Live The Kane

Tyrant Titan
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
17,150
Reputation
4,900
Daps
64,510
she telling her fans how to bypass the shyt they have in place to minimize manipulating the stream metrics…and when you take in regard all that shyt (playing 3 songs in between as a “buffer”, it only counting 20 songs per account, no repeat or looping) along with the already crazy amount of streams it takes to equal one sold song equivalent…you realize how small a drop in the bucket shyt like this ends up being

It’d take one person like 4 weeks of constant nonstop streaming to reflect one sold song equivalent…definitely would get more return on investment telling your stanbase to purchase multiple digital copies on different accounts
 
Top