Just saw this nikka on IG live get into a shootout with the cops... whoops

Savvir

Veteran
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
20,552
Reputation
3,309
Daps
106,726
this post and the essay you wrote both contribute to the arguments/efforts of Blue Lives Matter
exactly..

the blue lives matter crowd loves nikkas like them...
they put them on displays as examples of how blacks are complaining about issues that don't exist
nikka doesn't understand we have to be precise in how we move
nikka has no idea what comes with being on code
 

Sterling Archer

Spider Mane
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
35,833
Reputation
11,162
Daps
175,351
Reppin
Chicago
...and still no answer:heh:you trying too hard to not answer a simple question cause you know it doesn't support what you talmbowt
I didnt answer because it wasnt a question asked to me. But I can if you like. You said:
smh. Did we really need the vest cam to prove this clown was 100% wrong for being reckless ?
Tired of being in the middle of Blue Lives Matter folks, that cape for police no matter what and Cops Overreacted folks, that will always criticize police using legit plights to downplay reckless/degenerate behavior
So you claiming iif we remove police from convo, most humans will react calm and cautious towards another human being aggressive, threatening and hiding their hands?
To answer, yes. We did need a vest cam because without the vest cam all you have is an agitated man who had a domestic call placed on him by a neighbor, not his wife. A wife, who we see her tell the cops directly and him that there was no violence, only yelling. No one cares about "you being stuck in the middle". Dont even know why you said that. None of us care about where your moral ambiguity lies on police brutality. No malice, just the truth. Nothing he did, despite how ill-advised it was, that was captured on his own camera would justify lethal force. Now, we know after the bodycam came out that at the last moment he pulled a gun. That and that alone made it justified but you said he needed to be shot or at the very least implied that it was okay to shoot him when there was no gun involved at all. Which is exactly why I asked, well if you didnt need the bodycam to show he had a gun, then why did you never state that he had a gun until AFTER the bodycam confirmed. Not even a "I think he has a gun". No one at all in this entire thread said he had a gun. The most someone said was that he couldve had a gun You said basically that you cool with him being shot even without the gun.

In regard to "removing police from the convo" and how regular people with react in that situation....If you removed the police factor, then every person there is trespassing and escalating the situation to a shooting. I dont care how they would react because they shouldnt be there in the first place. That would make those people who were cops, a mob. And if youre asking if a mob of armed cacs will somehow negate that their mere presence in a strangers home and antagonizing him in his own home with firearms drawn on him would be a knock on him....:comeon:

Now since I answered someone else's question. Answer mine nikka.
 

WaveMolecules

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
15,029
Reputation
3,250
Daps
46,643
Reppin
Queens
Cops are NOT the people you need to convince of anything.

Tell it to the judge.

Comply, comply, comply. Always.

I keep my fukking mouth shut at all times around cops. If I do ever get to arrested, I will stay quiet until I see a judge. Then I sue the cop. Simple.

Dont ever talk to cops. Never.

Stupid fukk was calling for his wife to come over to him as if the cops are gonna go away after that or something :mjlol:

He was on SOMETHING.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-574
Daps
15,342
Reppin
WestMidWest
I didnt answer because it wasnt a question asked to me. But I can if you like. You said:
To answer, yes. We did need a vest cam because without the vest cam all you have is an agitated man who had a domestic call placed on him by a neighbor, not his wife. A wife, who we see her tell the cops directly and him that there was no violence, only yelling. No one cares about "you being stuck in the middle". Dont even know why you said that. None of us care about where your moral ambiguity lies on police brutality. No malice, just the truth. Nothing he did, despite how ill-advised it was, that was captured on his own camera would justify lethal force. Now, we know after the bodycam came out that at the last moment he pulled a gun. That and that alone made it justified but you said he needed to be shot or at the very least implied that it was okay to shoot him when there was no gun involved at all. Which is exactly why I asked, well if you didnt need the bodycam to show he had a gun, then why did you never state that he had a gun until AFTER the bodycam confirmed. Not even a "I think he has a gun". No one at all in this entire thread said he had a gun. The most someone said was that he couldve had a gun You said basically that you cool with him being shot even without the gun.

In regard to "removing police from the convo" and how regular people with react in that situation....If you removed the police factor, then every person there is trespassing and escalating the situation to a shooting. I dont care how they would react because they shouldnt be there in the first place. That would make those people who were cops, a mob. And if youre asking if a mob of armed cacs will somehow negate that their mere presence in a strangers home and antagonizing him in his own home with firearms drawn on him would be a knock on him....:comeon:

Now since I answered someone else's question. Answer mine nikka.
An accidental bump,
online criticism,
being cut off in traffic,
abortion debate,
being rejected by a woman, and
saving the life of animals,
all sparked aggressive reactionary behavior in humans, but a human being aggressive, threatening while hiding your hands, doesn't?:comeon:at least put some effort in hiding your agenda and dapfishing efforts

Being in the middle of Blue Live Matter and your camp is tiresome because as your actions in this thread shows, both self serving groups aren't concerned with solving problems, ignore/minimize personal accountability, and will manipulate folks by piggybacking on legit issues. Both of yall are Manchurian candidates, where buzzwords/labels triggers the type of opinion you'll have

"Don't tell me how to react to your overreaction" is why I side with
-Chris Brown in the Offset beef (despite me hating both)
-The innocent breh that shot the football player in traffic, who was following him and approach him aggressively after threatening to have a gun(despite me liking football)
-the cops in this case
-any human reacting to unwarranted aggression
 

Rozay Oro

2 Peter 3:9 if you don’t know God
Supporter
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
41,252
Reputation
5,303
Daps
75,101
1ce428ac7dd61c7d9c5bc60673972fd5---years-year-old.jpg


Wait this is the steroid dude with the white chick that had that long ass thread on here! Didn’t they get charged for child abuse and it also looks like they deleted all their old pics and videos. Also she got some huge nasty looking breast implants, she already had got the ass done a few years back.:wtf: Dude doesn’t even look the same compared to back when he was roiding and working out tough. Obviously he’s smaller but he doesn’t look as happy, bunch of tattoos and you can tell he’s in a bad place from the captions and content of his new rap music :snoop: what a fitting ending to a crazy ass story.

Edit: just watched the video. Both of them are dumbasses smh. He’s definitely trying to be something he’s not and almost got clapped clout chasing.
Breh look like the lobster from SpongeBob
 
Top