Justice Scalia has passed

RickyGQ

No nikkas!
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,071
Reputation
2,874
Daps
66,100
Reppin
NJ
Uncle Thomas must be so lost now:mjlol:


:merchant:

You don't win in life without taking chances. Hillary isn't a shoe-in and can absolutely lose the general election too. :what:

Basing your political moves out of fear of your political adversaries is some buster ass shyt.

That's what I'm saying. We tried y'all way for too long. Time for something new.



:sas2:
 

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,985
Reputation
2,644
Daps
58,851
Reppin
Raleigh
This is why you albino snow monkeys get on my nerve. Would any of you cum colored CACS answer this.

So why does the black population rate at Harvard have a 96 percent graduation rate?
Actually for the Ivy League the numbers are extremely high
1) Harvard : 96 percent
2) Yale: 94 percent
3) Princeton university : 94 percent
4) Brown University : 91 percent
5)University of Penn: 91 percent
6)Columbia :90 percent
7)Cornell: 86 percent
8)Dartmouth : 86 percent

Source : JBHE

Not bad for a group of people who supposed to get washed at these prestigious institutions.

Have a goodnight CACS, and both of you guys can Fukk off!

That's Ivy League. They ain't taking anyone they don't want and they're clearly the top 0.01% of any race.
 

Edub

Veteran
Joined
Jan 31, 2015
Messages
32,594
Reputation
2,571
Daps
73,361
He re-wrote the Confrontation Clause.

He made statutory interpretation mean something again.

He redefined the Second Amendment.

He made the free exercise clause not apply to neutral laws of general application.

Love him or hate him, he's easily one of the most influential justices of all time.
These are all minor in my opinion...at least comparatively to the amount of legislation/legal issues that SHOULD be fixed...he was a tool used by republicans and corporate entities hand selected by Reagan himself. Nothing was influential about scalia...oconnor influential , marshall influential, Scalia not so much.
 
Last edited:

RickyGQ

No nikkas!
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
18,071
Reputation
2,874
Daps
66,100
Reppin
NJ
this is our chance to get back at them for replacing a black social justice legend like thurgood marshall with clarence uncle fukkin thomas.

He's appointed two women (white and Hispanic)... I'd love him to appoint a black woman and complete the cipher...
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,078
Daps
641,716
Reppin
The Deep State
Uncle Thomas must be so lost now:mjlol:

odlgxBH.png
 

714562

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
7,767
Reputation
1,640
Daps
17,487
These are all minor in my opinion...at least comparatively to the amount of legislation/legal issues that SHOULD be fixed...he has was a tool used by republicans and corporate entities hand selected by Reagan himself. Nothing was influential about scalia...oconnor influential , marshall influential, Scalia not so much.

If those are all minor accomplishments "in your opinion," then :heh:

Thurgood Marshall's biggest legal accomplishments were as a lawyer, not a supreme court justice. As a justice, Scalia is far more influential. O'Connor has a couple of major opinions (Casey and Grutter), but Scalia's catalog is far more impressive. He wrote opinions that will be part of the law school canon for generations.
 

Spanky 6000

Banned
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
674
Reputation
-1,370
Daps
979
Reppin
Ohio
It is interesting how so many people in this thread want Obama to nominate a justice based on their race, gender, ethnicity, etc and not qualifications.

All liberals care about is identity politics.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,786
Reputation
3,895
Daps
167,194
Reppin
Brooklyn
U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren
3 hrs ·
The sudden death of Justice Scalia creates an immediate vacancy on the most important court in the United States.

Senator McConnell is right that the American people should have a voice in the selection of the next Supreme Court justice. In fact, they did — when President Obama won the 2012 election by five million votes.

Article II Section 2 of the Constitution says the President of the United States nominates justices to the Supreme Court, with the advice and consent of the Senate. I can't find a clause that says "...except when there's a year left in the term of a Democratic President."

Senate Republicans took an oath just like Senate Democrats did. Abandoning the duties they swore to uphold would threaten both the Constitution and our democracy itself. It would also prove that all the Republican talk about loving the Constitution is just that — empty talk.
 
Top