Justice Scalia has passed

2ndFiend

Rookie
Joined
Apr 4, 2015
Messages
32
Reputation
10
Daps
55
How is it racist??? Students who don't have the qualifications to get into a certain school are more likely to struggle than those that do. That applies to students of every color but in this case he was referring to black students because they were discussing race based affirmative action.

Scalia wasn't referring to all black students.......he was referring to black students who get into a certain college through affirmative action. Are you really too dumb to understand that?

Not racist.

Under qualified students get in to prestigious school due to affirmative action. Said students struggle in class because students who were actually qualified wash them.

Said under qualified students are disproportionately minority.

Also :mjlol: at that last line. Did I invade your safe space? :mjlol:

"..........."There are those who contend that it does not benefit African Americans to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less-advanced school, a slower-track school where they do well," Scalia said referencing an amicus brief........"

He did not qualify that shyt don't pretend he did. He made a blanket statement: African Americans.

Wtf has happened to this board?I realize you're tired of conversing with your fellow mouth breathers but kindly carry your ass back to st0rmfr0nt.
 
Last edited:

Spanky 6000

Banned
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
674
Reputation
-1,370
Daps
979
Reppin
Ohio
"..........."There are those who contend that it does not benefit African Americans to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less-advanced school, a slower-track school where they do well," Scalia said referencing an amicus brief........"

He did not qualify that shyt don't pretend he did. He made a blanket statement: African Americans.

Please carry your ass back to st0rmfr0nt.

The context for that quote was a court case specifically about affirmative action you idiot. Scalia was referring to students who get into school solely through affirmative action.
 

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,139
Reputation
-2,680
Daps
9,777
This is the member of the Supreme Court of the United States who said (with no shame) that blacks were not mentally capable of attending "fast-track" institutions.

No. I'm not mourning his death and won't pretend to. Gtfoh...

Underqualified minority kids were getting put into elite schools via affirmative action and then underperforming compared to other, mostly white students.

Scalia was merely pointing out they wouldn't get washed by their classmates if they went to schools they were properly qualified for. That's not racist.

Truth hurts sometimes don't it?
 

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,139
Reputation
-2,680
Daps
9,777
"..........."There are those who contend that it does not benefit African Americans to get them into the University of Texas where they do not do well, as opposed to having them go to a less-advanced school, a slower-track school where they do well," Scalia said referencing an amicus brief........"

He did not qualify that shyt don't pretend he did. He made a blanket statement: African Americans.

Wtf has happened to this board?I realize you're tired of conversing with your fellow mouth breathers but kindly carry your ass back to st0rmfr0nt.

If black students are ACTUALLY being put in to schools they're underqualified for and then are having trouble keeping up, it's not racist to point out the fact.

"Wtf happened to this board" Did I invade your safe space bro. :mjlol:
 

2ndFiend

Rookie
Joined
Apr 4, 2015
Messages
32
Reputation
10
Daps
55
Yes
If black students are ACTUALLY being put in to schools they're underqualified for and then are having trouble keeping up, it's not racist to point out the fact.

"Wtf happened to this board" Did I invade your safe space bro. :mjlol:


Yes you have invaded my safe space. Like lice. Like roaches. Question is, why? Don't you have other priorities? Such as propping up the trailer? Brushing your tooth? Screwing your sister?
 

2ndFiend

Rookie
Joined
Apr 4, 2015
Messages
32
Reputation
10
Daps
55
The context for that quote was a court case specifically about affirmative action you idiot. Scalia was referring to students who get into school solely through affirmative action.

He was referring to ALL African Americans who get in through affirmative action. A blanket, racist statement. This is the point you are missing Mr. Simple.
 

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,139
Reputation
-2,680
Daps
9,777
Yes



Yes you have invaded my safe space. Like lice. Like roaches. Question is, why? Don't you have other priorities? Such as propping up the trailer? Brushing your tooth? Screwing your sister?

You're so weak nikka.

You're right about one thing though, I should get back to my casebooks and slaying p*ssy at one of the best party schools in the country instead of engaging someone who probably has to go to the public library to get computer access to post on The Coli. :mjlol:
 

Scoop

All Star
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
6,139
Reputation
-2,680
Daps
9,777
He was referring to ALL African Americans who get in through affirmative action. A blanket, racist statement. This is the point you are missing Mr. Simple.

He was saying affirmative action puts some minority students in situations they're not prepared for, setting them up for failure.

Again, that's not racist. It may be true (I don't have proof it is true, so I won't say it is).
 

Soymuscle Mike

Formerly known as Vincenzo Corleone
Supporter
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
12,604
Reputation
5,775
Daps
62,587
Reppin
Sweetlake City
The amount of daps I've given folk in this thread is ungodly :wow:

All up in this thread on some
900x900px-LL-3ffaf128_monta-ellis-handshake.gif
 

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
54,179
Reputation
9,797
Daps
161,841
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
As to the first bolded sentence: In the 1970s, statutory interpretation was very loosey-goosey. Judges would look everywhere except the language of the law first. Scalia changed all that. Now, basically every judge in America is a "textualist." All statutory interpretation begins an ends with an analysis of the language itself. He's co-authored incredibly influential books with Bryan Garner on the subject. Even Justice Kagan has basically acknowledged that he completely changed the field and considers herself a "textualist."

As to the second bolded sentence: He wrote this opinion -- Employment Division v. Smith - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The reason why the First Amendment does not protect religious people from neutral laws of general application is because Scalia wrote that.

Hmmm. I learned something today. Pos rep.
 
Top