Kamala Harris 1st Interview For Presidency - Tonight At 9pm

ORDER_66

I am The Wrench in all your plans....
Bushed
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
153,490
Reputation
17,565
Daps
603,058
Reppin
Queens,NY
You might be the WOAT poster on here and that’s saying something :laff:

44d.png


:what:
 

Jalether

Superstar
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,635
Reputation
2,308
Daps
43,946
After she does an interview by herself:
-why can't she do a live interview

Then
-why can't she do a live interview on a real network like Fox?

-why can't she do an interview with a real journalist?

-why can't she do interviews during the day?

-why can't she do an interview without laughing???


:russell:
Then bothsiders will go "why can't she do interview with an FBA like tariq"
"why can't she do ancestry test". The goalpost never stops moving:mjlol:
 

Jalether

Superstar
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,635
Reputation
2,308
Daps
43,946
You should follow your own advice. You're constantly getting involved in discussions and derailing threads with misleading Trump talking points. Ask yourself why you're so eager to spread their narratives, even though you claim to hold the belief that both sides are bad.

Because He's either a cac or a c00n.
 

JT-Money

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
14,701
Reputation
4,914
Daps
60,892
Reppin
NULL
If the multiple times she’s answered the question and all the proof of her acknowledging her blackness in the past hasn’t been enough for you, what would answering it in the interview have done?
If her answer keeps changing depending on the audience. She obviously hasn't cleared anything up. Especially not in front of a nationwide audience.
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
56,806
Reputation
22,111
Daps
309,604
So democrats are mad that the questions were too hard, republicans are mad that the questions were too easy, leftists are mad she has some moderate views, right wingers are mad she has some liberal views....and normal people saw it and said "ah not bad, I'll prob vote for her" and went on with their day.
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
23,633
Reputation
13,361
Daps
136,922
Is she saying the Child Tax Credit will only be for the first year of a child’s life? That’s a pretty dramatic scale back from the original.
She plans on expanding it.

If you're trying to curtail immigration, you need to give parents the means to raise their children. Someone has to do those jobs the immigrants were doing.

Making it easier for people to sue employers and unionize can raise wages. The employer doesn't have undocumented or temporary workers to use as leverage against you.

Making drug costs cheaper can make it easier to afford medicine for your child if it has special needs, and having someone negotiate the price for you can help if you're getting older and need medication yourself.

Making it easier to buy a house means your debts can be tied up in the equity of the home and couple that in with your increased wage and you'll be doing much better than if those options weren't available to you.

Expand the tax credits, make housing cheaper, tax grocery stores more if they're reporting record profits while raising the costs of essentials, and shrink expenditure on foreign aid. If you can do that and cut taxes on people making less than 80k a year, that's a big boost that isn't being offered by Republicans.

The key thing is your state though. If your state representatives aren't accessing the federal funding earmarked to help you because they don't want to look as if they're actually working with "the other side" then you won't benefit. What Walz's team did for his state can happen in all 50 if you vote for politicians who are blue or at least have a history of agreeing to compromise with democrats to bring some money and jobs to your state.

She didnt say that arms exporting is off the table for Israel and she emphasized that "a deal needs to be made"

Nobody is sure of what that will actually mean until she's in office. It could be the same song and dance as Biden, or it could be


"We are halting all weapons packages to Israel until an agreement is reached. Israel cannot continue its campaign without our support, and in the interest of peace and stability a deal can only be reached if we are not actively giving Israel the means to continue its campaign. We have supported Israel with top of the line ordinance, and hamas is a terrorist organization without the kinds of cutting edge weapons that only America can create. Israel can choose to seek peace with our support, or they can continue to wage war. They will not continue to wage war with weapons funded by our taxpayers while being unwilling to negotiate a peaceful solution and take steps towards a two state solution"

It's impossible to argue against a stance like that without coming of as a gigantic piece of shyt or an unhinged lunatic who refuses to believe what his eyes and ears are telling him.
 
Last edited:

Prince.Skeletor

Don’t Be Like He-Man
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
31,056
Reputation
-7,050
Daps
60,831
Reppin
Bucktown
There's a bunch of excerpts with commentary
But that commentary kinda be like ya I think i'll wait to watch the full interview
These excerpts are useless, only meant to hype the full version up.. Which I get

How do you think she will do?




Listen to the video at 34:40
He says something VERY VERY IMPORTANT regarding immigration!!!!!
 
Top