Kamala Harris Fails To Explain Why She Didn't Prosecute Steve Mnuchin's Bank

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,718
Reputation
9,192
Daps
143,029
Old article. But given all the talk about how "unfair" criticisms of some possible Democratic candidates have been, I thought it was timely all the same.

Hot Takes:
  • Steve Mnuchin donated to Kamala's campaign
  • There were over one thousand violation of foreclosure laws that her office was aware of
  • Other people in her office felt they had a strong enough case to prosecute.
  • Despite the above she declined to prosecute.
That shyt isn't wavy :francis:

Kamala Harris Fails to Explain Why She Didn’t Prosecute Steven Mnuchin’s Bank
FORMER CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY General Kamala Harris on Wednesday vaguely acknowledged The Intercept’s report about her declining to prosecute Steven Mnuchin’s OneWest Bank for foreclosure violations in 2013, but offered no explanation.

“It’s a decision my office made,” she said, in response to questions from The Hill shortly after being sworn in as California’s newest U.S. senator.

“We went and we followed the facts and the evidence, and it’s a decision my office made,” Harris said. “We pursued it just like any other case. We go and we take a case wherever the facts lead us.”

Mnuchin is Donald Trump’s nominee to run the Treasury Department, and served as CEO of OneWest from 2009 to 2015. In an internal memo published on Tuesday by The Intercept, prosecutors at the California attorney general’s office said they had found over a thousand violations of foreclosure laws by his bank during that time, and predicted that further investigation would uncover many thousands more.

But the investigation into what the memo called “widespread misconduct” was closed after Harris’s office declined to file a civil enforcement action against the bank.

Harris’s statement on Tuesday doesn’t explain how involved she was with the decision to not prosecute, or why the decision was made. She also would not say whether the revelations would disqualify Mnuchin for the position of treasury secretary. “The hearings will reveal if it’s disqualifying or not, but certainly he has a history that should be critically examined, as do all of the nominees,” Harris told The Hill. She added that she would review the background and history of all Trump cabinet nominees.

Senate Democrats have vowed to put up a fight over Mnuchin — even creating a website inviting homeowners to list their complaints against OneWest. And yet not one senator has commented publicly on the leaked memo, which received media coverage in Politico, Bloomberg, the New York Post, CBS News, Vanity Fair, CNN, CNBC, and other outlets.

The Intercept has reached out to half a dozen Senate Democratic offices, including those of Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and leading Mnuchin critics Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, receiving no response.

Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisc., retweeted the story, as did the Twitter account of the Democratic National Committee. But another DNC tweet just hours later hinted at the bind Democrats are in when it comes to using the information against Mnuchin. That tweet praised Harris’s swearing-in. Her decision not to prosecute may make her new colleagues wary of pursuing it.

Progressive groups have not been so reluctant. Three groups — the Rootstrikers project at Demand Progress, the Center for Popular Democracy’s Fed Up Campaign, and the California Reinvestment Coalition – have called for a delay of Mnuchin’s confirmation hearing until he publicly discloses all settlements and lawsuits OneWest has faced from its foreclosure-related activities, responds fully to all questions submitted by members of the Senate Finance Committee, and publicly discloses his role in obstructing the California attorney general investigation, or any others.

The California Reinvestment Coalition followed that up on Thursday by asking OneWest to release the obstructed evidence, which involved loan files held by a third party then known as Lender Processing Services (it’s now called Black Knight Financial Services). “That’s something the Senate Finance Committee should ask him for, prior to scheduling their hearing with him,” said Paulina Gonzalez, executive director of the California Reinvestment Coalition.

Mnuchin has already declined to answer a detailed list of questions from Finance Committee member Sherrod Brown, which Brown sent before the release of the leaked memo.

After The Intercept story was published, Mnuchin spokesperson Barney Keller called it “meritless,” and highlighted OneWest’s completion of a foreclosure review with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (which involved completely separate issues from the California inquiry) and what he claimed was OneWest’s issuance of over 100,000 loan modifications to borrowers.

“Memos like this belong in the garbage, not the news,” Keller said.

Meanwhile, the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, an organizing group that made headlines in 2010 by protesting on Mnuchin’s front lawn over OneWest’s foreclosure practices, expressed disbelief that he could now become treasury secretary. “My family lived first hand the fraud and unethical behavior under his leadership when I was told to default before they could help me, and (was) instead pushed into foreclosure,” said Peggy Mears, a OneWest victim.

ACCE plans to ask incoming California Attorney General Xavier Becerra to take up the prosecution of OneWest based on the newly released evidence. And the group vowed to fight the Mnuchin nomination. “No one who oversaw the defrauding of thousands of homeowners should be allowed to serve watch over our country’s money,” Mears said.
 
Last edited:

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,251
Reputation
3,851
Daps
164,717
Reppin
Brooklyn
What a pos that's almost as bad as being Steve Mnuchin. What's he up to these days anyways?
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,718
Reputation
9,192
Daps
143,029
What a pos that's almost as bad as being Steve Mnuchin. What's he up to these days anyways?
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. :russ::russ:

But...if he was in jail, like he is supposed to be, the only thing he would be up to is running around the minimum security prison yard for daily exercise.

Now he is doing big things. :francis: Just Saying.
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
92,251
Reputation
3,851
Daps
164,717
Reppin
Brooklyn
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not. :russ::russ:

But...if he was in jail, like he is supposed to be, the only thing he would be up to is running around the minimum security prison yard for daily exercise.

Now he is doing big things. :francis: Just Saying.


You mean he's still not in jail? Didn't his bank illegally foreclose on thousands of people during the mortgage crisis and ruin countless lives? Big things now you say?

Mnuchin's name isn't going to be on our money or set monetary policy or something serious right? Should I be concerned?


:patrice:

:troll:
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
21,243
Reputation
6,563
Daps
66,915
Reppin
San Diego
This kind of black or white thinking is devastating to these elections, and needs to stop. I don't know all the details of this, but I will find out, calling Kamala Harris corrupt, because charges weren't filed in a state level case involing very sophisticated financial fraud violations is not accurate or constructive.
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,718
Reputation
9,192
Daps
143,029
This kind of black or white thinking is devastating to these elections, and needs to stop. I don't know all the details of this, but I will find out, calling Kamala Harris corrupt, because charges weren't filed in a state level case involing very sophisticated financial fraud violations is not accurate or constructive.
The thing is, Kamala Harris doesn't have to be the Democratic Nominee. The media and "insiders" are propping her up for an obvious run but just because they are trying to sell you this, doesn't mean you have to buy.

This is all way too early to discuss anyways as she has to get through a primary and we have to see who else runs.

But there is nothing wrong with vetting candidates to your party. Not saying people have to be perfect, but at the same time, you can't do shyt like this and then expect people to fully believe you're sincere about holding white collar criminals who further economic inequality in this country accountable.
 

ORDER_66

I am The Wrench in all your plans....
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
151,209
Reputation
17,185
Daps
597,304
Reppin
Queens,NY
This kind of black or white thinking is devastating to these elections, and needs to stop. I don't know all the details of this, but I will find out, calling Kamala Harris corrupt, because charges weren't filed in a state level case involing very sophisticated financial fraud violations is not accurate or constructive.

It's not black and white thinking... if it's corruption or cronyism it needs to be shouted out... If you didnt prosecute a known corrupted lobbyist that GAVE YOU CAMPAIGN MONEY PERSONALLY... would anyone trust that person to work for the regular people in this tenious climate?!? :francis: NOPE.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,091
Reppin
the ether
One of my 3-4 strong reasons for leaving the Democrats was the fact that they are just as beholden to the financial interests running the country's money as the Republicans are.

Obama did nothing to actually bring down the lending criminals, he simply tried to improve the system just enough that it would run smoothly without crashing.
 

re'up

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
21,243
Reputation
6,563
Daps
66,915
Reppin
San Diego
What I see is knee jerk responses to complex and layered issues. Mnuchin is an absolute reprehensible person, and I am sure he was guilty of fraud, and more, and deserved to be prosecuted. But, to lay this all on Kamala Harris? Was he even indicted? What kind of case was put together? Why wasn't it handled at a federal level? It's just an unrealistic approach to the everything. I think if you believe Kamala Harris conspired or even colluded to not charge Mnuchin because of cronyism or corruption, or some campaign donations, you don't have a fundamental understanding of much that goes on in those worlds.
 

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,566
Reputation
12,760
Daps
92,572
One of my 3-4 strong reasons for leaving the Democrats was the fact that they are just as beholden to the financial interests running the country's money as the Republicans are.

Obama did nothing to actually bring down the lending criminals, he simply tried to improve the system just enough that it would run smoothly without crashing.

What party (if any) do you align yourself with now?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,331
Reputation
19,930
Daps
204,091
Reppin
the ether
What party (if any) do you align yourself with now?

I don't align myself with a party, and since 2010 I decided that I probably never again will (I had first left the Democrats in 2004 when Kerry was going pro-war and pro-rich, but came back in 2007 solely for Obama). I've realized at this point that the system is designed such that virtually no meaningful, real change will occur through support of any particular party, because those parties rely on enormous amounts of money to win elections and are influenced by enormous amounts of money via lobbying, and they will get far more of that money from the financial sector and the defense sector and the corporate sector than they ever will from regular people. Especially regular Black people. Even Obama, with all of his background and experience, was only willing to play around the edges of the system while the systemic problems with the system actually got worse.

I think that most of the solutions we need will come from our own actions, as families and as a community, outside of the political system. But to the degree we seek political solutions, we will find them not by aligning with any party, but by holding a fire under the politicians and their voters until they're forced to change. In the 1950s and 1960s, neither party was going to pass Black Civil Rights just because they got voted for, or just because of any internal action. It took massive national action by the community to force politicians to do what neither they nor their mainstream supporters wanted them to do.
 

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,566
Reputation
12,760
Daps
92,572
I don't align myself with a party, and since 2010 I decided that I probably never again will (I had first left the Democrats in 2004 when Kerry was going pro-war and pro-rich, but came back in 2007 solely for Obama). I've realized at this point that the system is designed such that virtually no meaningful, real change will occur through support of any particular party, because those parties rely on enormous amounts of money to win elections and are influenced by enormous amounts of money via lobbying, and they will get far more of that money from the financial sector and the defense sector and the corporate sector than they ever will from regular people. Especially regular Black people. Even Obama, with all of his background and experience, was only willing to play around the edges of the system while the systemic problems with the system actually got worse.

I think that most of the solutions we need will come from our own actions, as families and as a community, outside of the political system. But to the degree we seek political solutions, we will find them not by aligning with any party, but by holding a fire under the politicians and their voters until they're forced to change. In the 1950s and 1960s, neither party was going to pass Black Civil Rights just because they got voted for, or just because of any internal action. It took massive national action by the community to force politicians to do what neither they nor their mainstream supporters wanted them to do.

Thank you very much for responding so completely.
 
Top