Rigby.
The #1 Rated Mixtape of all Time
It could be a season record...could be that they had 4 then all stars and 3 vets/former all stars who turned out great performances with Ian Clark who turned out to be a great player in his own right....could just be the season record thoIt's odd that a season record is what makes a team considered the best of all time even though they fail to win what matters. That being the case please.

1. best team based on winning 73 wins in a NBA where there were several 60 wins/fringe 60 wins team and even another fukking 70 win teamBest Team in the NBA based on what? Cavs won the TITLE that year. That means the CAVS were the best team. And yall also say KD choked against them, SOHH were GS invincible or not. LeBron & Wade were regarded as the absolute best of the best. GS only had Steph who most of yall on this very forum said wasn't really shyt. KD joining them means nothing.
LeBron quit on his CLE team to go to Miami.

2. OKC dubbed the aforementioned 70 win team and had an incredible "big" lineup they employed that dominated opposing teams in spurts, them being comparable to GS (with KD) only hurts your case that this wasn't a shameful move and that GS wasn't an overall incredible all time team just based on the fact they beat them ON THE ROAD WITHOUT STEPH EVEN MATTERING
chess not checkers nikka :nigpls:3. before you come back with "oh but if OKC was close to GS, then why is this a bad move", well my friend, OKC runs an iso superstar-built offense and OKC only had 2 superstars at that point. Sohh essentially KD was responsible for around half the offensive production on a good day, and thats what helped OKC get the early lead on GS.
4. The only teams to come close to beating GS (or actually do it) were composed of all time great iso offenses, and in 2 of those 3 cases, the 60 win teams didnt win. THAT WOULD BE PRETTY CLOSE TO INVINCIBLE IF YOU ASKED ME
5. IDK if you want me to further explain to you why Miami, with 3 stars and only 2 that you admit are the best of the best, isnt on the same wavelength as GS, with 4 stars who are all considered the best at their craft, but I refuse to further discuss that. Here's a situation: there's a B/R article that wondered if Miami or Chicago was a better opponent to Dallas, and I believe depth was one of the things that they said Miami didn't have. Now check this: this is probably the least depth GS has had during their run. They proceeded to play the Spurs without Kawhi that needed 87 year old Manu to clutch out the 4th just to win a game, the Pelicans who got ref ball'd repeatedly (Ill admit tho, pelicans were on their shyt leading up to this, GS did a good job defensively), and the Rockets who looked completely hapless from top to bottom without Chris Paul in. not even gonna mention cleveland. so the least deep GS squad in 4 years was deeper than all the teams they played. So no, they didnt only have steph either
and he caught plenty of backlash from his Celtics teammates for leaving and still have tension to this day 


. Crybaby ass nikka

