KD had beef with Warriors reporters + their obsession with Steph Curry / Klay according to new book

BXKingPin82

BXKingPin82

The Chairman of the Board will be... The Kingpin
Supporter
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
59,104
Reputation
13,572
Daps
199,404
Reppin
Bronx NY
Damn man.

KD is pretty much a human version of Daffy Duck.

:ohhh:
 
Woodrow

Woodrow

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
8,450
Reputation
1,687
Daps
33,138
Reppin
NULL
G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman said:
"Steph sacrificed Billions of dollars for Under Armour by recruiting KD"

Never thought about it but he's right...it's only significant because Steph has ownership in the company


Click to expand...


it's insignificant. it wasn't an altruistic gesture. steph weighed his options and DECIDED the financial sacrifice was less important than the pursuit of his own goal: more chips.

he doesn't deserve special consideration for it after the fact. he made a choice. the same way KD invited all this scrutiny -- unfair or not -- when he chose to play for GState.

also, strauss acknowledges there are other factors that likely impacted under armour's bottom line that have nothing to do with KD joining the team. factors he flirts with going into detail about (bad decision-making in the product realm, coupled with advancements by nike... which was already feeling pressure from adidas to up its game at the time), but then quickly pivots back to his broader point that "there's a clear before and after" regarding UA profitability and KD's arrival. i hope he has a better justification in the book, cause based on the interview that shyt is flim-flam.
 
G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman

Logic Is Absent Wherever Hate Is Present
Joined
May 12, 2012
Messages
79,937
Reputation
5,731
Daps
235,015
Woodrow said:
it's insignificant. it wasn't an altruistic gesture. steph weighed his options and DECIDED the financial sacrifice was less important than the pursuit of his own goal: more chips.

he doesn't deserve special consideration for it after the fact. he made a choice. the same way KD invited all this scrutiny -- unfair or not -- when he chose to play for GState.

also, strauss acknowledges there are other factors that likely impacted under armour's bottom line that have nothing to do with KD joining the team. factors he flirts with going into detail about (bad decision-making in the product realm, coupled with advancements by nike... which was already feeling pressure from adidas to up its game at the time), but then quickly pivots back to his broader point that "there's a clear before and after" regarding UA profitability and KD's arrival. i hope he has a better justification in the book, cause based on the interview that shyt is flim-flam.
Click to expand...
You make good points...but so does ESS. Both points can be true.
 
J

JYoung24

Young J
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
7,933
Reputation
-815
Daps
6,456
Reppin
NULL
murksiderock said:
@Kinguno

By the way, the seminal players of the 10s were Bron, KD, Steph, I agree with you. Kawhi is a distant fourth, winning that backdoor chip last year has elevated him overnight into discussions he wasn't in a year ago, meaning, people thought he could be the best player alive if he was healthy, but legacy wise?

People weren't having legacy conversations about Kawhi a year ago, his resume ain't on the level of the other three guys. And I don't think he has a strong argument that he's better than any of them; at no point in Kawhi's career has he been a greater player than KD when KD is healthy; at no point in Kawhi's career until LeBron went down in Year 16 was he better than LeBron, yet people throw parties like a guy 8 years younger shouldn't be better than anybody playing in their 16th year if that guy is truly an elite player...

And Kawhi struggled acclimating with Aldridge the first year Aldridge came to SA, Kawhi dealt with injuries that postseason but he hardly left a mark in 2016, which we all know was the Year of Steph. His impact and legacy on the sport pales in comparison to Steph's, and he's only two years younger in basketball years. He may be better than Steph now but he ain't anywhere near Steph on a legacy scale yet...

The difference is while we know all athletes have egos, and they all think about being the greatest player and beating their top competition, Durant is the only one with a seemingly unhealthy obsession over it. They all think about it, they all want to be the last man standing, but only KD pouts if some random 34-year old white woman from Kansas posts on her Twitter that somebody is better than him...
Click to expand...

Kwai is better then lebron tho
 
I AM WARHOL

I AM WARHOL

Veteran
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
29,826
Reputation
5,144
Daps
122,310
Reppin
ATL
KD wasnt prepared for the backlash his move would cause. He needed the support of the full organization to help him bear the brunt. But he didnt get that. Klay and Steph did the best they could. But between the GS media, the little jabs the GM and announcer made at the parade, and draymond, he didnt recieve that support. People within the org added fuel to the divisive narratives.

That's like if when Bron went to miami, Pat riley started making slick jokes about how the team would always be Wade's team. Or if his teammates started talking spicy about him choking whenever things got hot in the locker rooms.

KD is definitely sensitive, but I dont think the full warrior organization did enough to fix the cracks when they started to appear. I think Steph and Klay did the best they could. But the warrior media members and FO dropped the ball.
 
S

SadimirPutin

Superstar
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
15,890
Reputation
2,319
Daps
60,500
I will say this...if kyrie is the fan favorite in brooklyn then watch this shyt happen AGAIN
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top