Keith Law gets Twitter suspension over evolution argument with Curt Schilling

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,845
Daps
43,545
It doesn't work this way :snoop:

1. Theres no evidence among competing species. Things diverged and some died. Theres little evidence of interaction among various hominids outside of neaderthals and its unknown how much interaction they had with modern homo sapiens

2. its hard to make fossils. Be happy you have some

3. physiologically, yes you can see transitions between species

4. we've known about evolution for about 150 years. And theres more evidence than just looking at animals. The genetic evidence is far more conclusive and should be more persuasive to you if you think you're going to find a cat-elephant or something fukking stupid.

so has AIDS evolved into the avian flu? Yes, they have shown natural selection to be true, with virus strains becoming resistent, but there's never been a full transition, even at the microscopic level, of one species evolving into another. The typical evolutionary theorist arguments are "You're stupid", "you're don't know what you're talking about" , "it's been proven". Look man, if we're going to apply the scientific method to this sh*t, we need hard proof, it's that simple. You can't say "all the other species died off, so I'm right". that's not proof, you're assuming sh*t, you're assuming these hominid skulls were humans and not some random species of ape/chimp. I don't agree with Schilling's statements as a definite proof of the creation theory, but he's making some very valid, basic arguments
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
338,367
Reputation
-35,048
Daps
641,696
Reppin
The Deep State
so has AIDS evolved into the avian flu?

Hold up.
Are you fukking serious with this dumb shyt?

They're even remotely the same in STRUCTURE.

Yes, they have shown natural selection to be true, with virus strains becoming resistent, but there's never been a full transition, even at the microscopic level, of one species evolving into another. The typical evolutionary theorist arguments are "You're stupid", "you're don't know what you're talking about" , "it's been proven". Look man, if we're going to apply the scientific method to this sh*t, we need hard proof, it's that simple. You can't say "all the other species died off, so I'm right". that's not proof, you're assuming sh*t, you're assuming these hominid skulls were humans and not some random species of ape/chimp. I don't agree with Schilling's statements as a definite proof of the creation theory, but he's making some very valid, basic arguments
Why do you think natural selection isn't evolution??????

And yes we have hard proof. Look at phylogenetics.

You have no problem with paternity tests do you?
 

blackzeus

Superstar
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
21,666
Reputation
2,845
Daps
43,545
Hold up.
Are you fukking serious with this dumb shyt?

They're even remotely the same in STRUCTURE.


Why do you think natural selection isn't evolution??????

And yes we have hard proof. Look at phylogenetics.

You have no problem with paternity tests do you?

I'm just saying, show me one virus that has evolved into a completely new virus. Even at the microscopic level, only natural selection holds true. Natural selection isn't evolution because natural selection doesn't claim one species changes into another, only that natural selection forces the best in each species to find a way to survive. Natural selection may cause only humans who can survive the winter to exist in Siberia, but natural selection is not going to cause humans to evolve into polar bears. Let's assume I'm dumb and know nothing about biology. Please explain to me how matching DNA segments proves evolution? :ohhh:
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
93,347
Reputation
3,905
Daps
166,569
Reppin
Brooklyn
I'm just saying, show me one virus that has evolved into a completely new virus. Even at the microscopic level, only natural selection holds true. Natural selection isn't evolution because natural selection doesn't claim one species changes into another, only that natural selection forces the best in each species to find a way to survive. Natural selection may cause only humans who can survive the winter to exist in Siberia, but natural selection is not going to cause humans to evolve into polar bears. Let's assume I'm dumb and know nothing about biology. Please explain to me how matching DNA segments proves evolution? :ohhh:


If "evolution" is real why are there still monkeys?
 
Top