Killzone ShadowFalls Multiple Player Not Native 1080p, 960x1080 Instead

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,487
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,455
Yup. Anything not negative about Xbox has to be some type of conspiracy :heh:

The benefits of 1080p 60fps are being overstated by console warriors, who are now upset that devs/journalists will not ride with them into the war.

In reality graphics don't make the game, graphical differences very rarely make a difference in the enjoyment you get from a game, and for most people in most situations they can't tell a difference unless you blow up two pictures and point them out. The only time performance matters is if you have a situation like skyrim where the game just doesn't work right on one system.
Why do you always resort to polar opposites when making a point?? Where do you see people literally saying "GRAPHICS MAKE A GAME!!"?? Nobody is saying graphics are the final say on whether or not a game is good, people are saying that if a game that comes out has better graphics than another platform with the same game then logic would dictate that the one with the better graphics/performance would be the "definitive" version if you want the best bang for your buck. I mean the games cost the same on both platforms. If you have both a PS4/XBone and BF4 is on your radar, why would you buy it for XB1 for?? Unless you have a bunch of friends who are on XB1, it makes zero sense to go with the worse version. That's like buying the dvd version of a movie when you can get it on bluray. Also you keep saying you can't tell a difference but yet the difference is obvious when you're seeing it in person. Yea if you never saw the other version you'd think it was alright but when you see both versions it's a no brainer to go with the better looking version.
 

LucaBrasi

West Coast Legend
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
4,052
Reputation
520
Daps
4,739
Reppin
California
obamakardashian3.gif


Ya Bish!



i'll let you know when one drops on the ps4


Oh I ain't worried, the superior MGSV is dropping in just a couple weeks, have fun enjoying MGSV with last gen quality frame rate and graphics. :pachaha:



I'm out


Obama+GIF.gif
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,487
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,455
Oh I ain't worried, the superior MGSV is dropping in just a couple weeks, have fun enjoying MGSV with last gen quality frame rate and graphics. :pachaha:



I'm out


Obama+GIF.gif
No no MGSV will not be a "true" 60fps game according to Meach because if it dips to 55fps a few times during gameplay then it's automatically disqualified. :troll:
 

AkaDemiK

I Love Hip-Hop
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
42,227
Reputation
6,191
Daps
106,435
Oh I ain't worried, the superior MGSV is dropping in just a couple weeks, have fun enjoying MGSV with last gen quality frame rate and graphics. :pachaha:



I'm out


Obama+GIF.gif

The same MGSV that you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between on next gen consoles if it wasn't for a spec list? cool...enjoy...I know I will...

in the meantime i'll be sitting back laughing as sony gets exposed day by day....this killzone shyt is spreading like wild fire right now...
 
Last edited:

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
73,733
Reputation
4,264
Daps
116,766
Reppin
Tha Land
Why do you always resort to polar opposites when making a point?? Where do you see people literally saying "GRAPHICS MAKE A GAME!!"??
That's literally all y'all talk about when it comes to gaming. TitanFall gets bashed cause its graphics. "720p :troll:" "ps3 exclusives look better" ect, ect. We have probably a half dozen threads talking about the graphical difference in ground zeroes, but not one talking about the actual details of the game.

Nobody is saying graphics are the final say on whether or not a game is good, people are saying that if a game that comes out has better graphics than another platform with the same game then logic would dictate that the one with the better graphics/performance would be the "definitive" version if you want the best bang for your buck.
And if you want "the best graphical bang for your buck" neither ps4 or Xbox is the right choice.

I mean the games cost the same on both platforms. If you have both a PS4/XBone and BF4 is on your radar, why would you buy it for XB1 for??
Friends, controller, ecosystem, DLC, there are plenty of reasons, and all of them take precedent over a barely noticeable visual difference. Just above you claimed graphics weren't the only thing that matters, and here you are 5 seconds later proclaiming graphical differences to be the only thing worth talking about when it comes to comparing experiences.

Unless you have a bunch of friends who are on XB1, it makes zero sense to go with the worse version. That's like buying the dvd version of a movie when you can get it on bluray. Also you keep saying you can't tell a difference but yet the difference is obvious when you're seeing it in person. Yea if you never saw the other version you'd think it was alright but when you see both versions it's a no brainer to go with the better looking version.
And most people don't have two TV's with two copies of each game to look at, which is why the small differences don't matter outside the console wars. People will buy the games for the platform they want to use the most, the same as they did last gen. I didn't see any of you claiming that it was stupid to buy multiplats on PS1, 2, or 3:stopitslime:
 
Last edited:

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
73,733
Reputation
4,264
Daps
116,766
Reppin
Tha Land
Oh I ain't worried, the superior MGSV is dropping in just a couple weeks, have fun enjoying MGSV with last gen quality frame rate and graphics. :pachaha:



I'm out


Obama+GIF.gif

:ohhh:So what your saying is. ALL playstation games thus far are "last gen"

Fatboi dapped you up too, but he'll pretend he doesn't make/cosign statements like that
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
73,733
Reputation
4,264
Daps
116,766
Reppin
Tha Land
No no MGSV will not be a "true" 60fps game according to Meach because if it dips to 55fps a few times during gameplay then it's automatically disqualified. :troll:

Once again playing dumb.

There is a big difference in dipping to 50fps occasionally and running at 50fps consistently

But go ahead and play dumb, pretend there isn't.
 

Fatboi1

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
62,487
Reputation
8,270
Daps
114,455
The same MGSV that you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between on next gen consoles if it wasn't for a spec list? cool...enjoy...I know I will...

in the meantime i'll be sitting back laughing as sony gets exposed day by day....this killzone shyt is spreading like wild fire right now...
:mjlol: juss stahp.
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,590
Reputation
2,755
Daps
45,353
That stems from the devs themselves making 1080p 60fps like the holy grail of gaming, knowing that standard will never be consistently achievable in an affordable console. And that the advantages arent that big in the dirst place. Now they have to backtrack on the years of promises and standards that they set. PS4 was called a "super computer" but is not performing as well as a low-mid end computer. At least microsft was forthcoming in their ambitions of putting out an all around entertainment machine.

1080p and 60fps aren't some arbitrary numbers created by 'devs'. it's what most HDTV's are capable of. it's already becoming 'the past' as HDTV's move on to higher resolutions and refresh rates. and it is "achievable", but they've decided it's not as important as using the horse-power for other eye candy. that I guess goes into what people expect from the "next gen". personally I think all that extra crap is wasted if I can't see it displayed 1:1. as a PC gamer, I would never play at less than my native resolution, and it's not like I have a super PC

at some point I'm actually surprised they can't squeeze more out of 8gb gddr5, 'coding to the metal', 'closed system', and blah blah blah
 
Top