King Flex back on Tucker Carlson for Round 2

[dtownreppin214]

I'm not apart of the Tariq Hate Brigade that runs rampant on this site and even contributed to a great thread where a fellow breh was prepared to combat anyone who came with FACTS about Tariq being a detriment or a race hustler ect...

Gotta say it brehs...

He should've left the first convo be the last convo with this CAC and here's why in my opinion:

1. Using the word "literally" implies "happened". I understanding attempting to use white supremacist tools of deception against them to make a point (I.E. Association by relation like how they have the "all inclusive LAWS" outchea). Unfortunately, the tweet and discussion about it I believe did not and will not translate well with HIS (Tariq's) audience or potential new audience. White supremacists tactics are so ridiculous that anyone who attempts to utilize them appear absurd and off their rocker to EVERYONE if they are not in the know of the satirical tone being used to exemplify white supremacy with a punchline attached in real time. Cacs know when they are being mocked and will laugh at every attempt made to show them theirselves because they are deviant, evil, and delusional. This segment LITERALLY was a waste of time.

2. Downplaying his previous works as if they were not of a sincere nature in the face of white supremacists. He LITERALLY could have referenced white folks who made a living off of HIS teachings, BY NAME, and mentioned the continued appropriation of OUR works (not collective culture) and come full circle to white supremacy and how much white supremacists LEECH off the world yet are never truly held accountable for their actions (and lack of production) even IF what they are leeching off of isn't deemed to be the most moral yet highly instituted. That would've been an awesome segue into heroin addiction, the CAC rapist high schooler, ect...


THIS interview wasn't a good look...I chuckled but nah...

I agree with all of this. I think Tariq is 0-2 now. @ThreeLetterAgency you know damn well Obannon isn't in the cabinet. Tariq needs to stop being so loose with the facts or at least be willing to concede a smaller point to make a bigger one.

 

[satam55]

Can't lose when you mention white supremacy or white supremacist because 99.9% of whites believe they're superior to black people.

A racist is different than a white supremacist, learn the difference.

What's the difference? To me the only difference is that White Supremacist is more specific to who it's calling out.

 

[heart]

I'm not apart of the Tariq Hate Brigade that runs rampant on this site and even contributed to a great thread where a fellow breh was prepared to combat anyone who came with FACTS about Tariq being a detriment or a race hustler ect...

Gotta say it brehs...

He should've left the first convo be the last convo with this CAC and here's why in my opinion:

1. Using the word "literally" implies "happened". I understanding attempting to use white supremacist tools of deception against them to make a point (I.E. Association by relation like how they have the "all inclusive LAWS" outchea). Unfortunately, the tweet and discussion about it I believe did not and will not translate well with HIS (Tariq's) audience or potential new audience. White supremacists tactics are so ridiculous that anyone who attempts to utilize them appear absurd and off their rocker to EVERYONE if they are not in the know of the satirical tone being used to exemplify white supremacy with a punchline attached in real time. Cacs know when they are being mocked and will laugh at every attempt made to show them theirselves because they are deviant, evil, and delusional. This segment LITERALLY was a waste of time.

2. Downplaying his previous works as if they were not of a sincere nature in the face of white supremacists. He LITERALLY could have referenced white folks who made a living off of HIS teachings, BY NAME, and mentioned the continued appropriation of OUR works (not collective culture) and come full circle to white supremacy and how much white supremacists LEECH off the world yet are never truly held accountable for their actions (and lack of production) even IF what they are leeching off of isn't deemed to be the most moral yet highly instituted. That would've been an awesome segue into heroin addiction, the CAC rapist high schooler, ect...


THIS interview wasn't a good look...I chuckled but nah...

I agree but there was no way Tucker would let him articulate those points in a 5 minute segment. Tariq seemed kinda nervous and was kinda fumbling over his words. Him calling his own books "satire" was not a good look as well but he's doing the interviews on FOX because it builds his brand.

 

[marcuz]

i havent listened yet, but tariq is going to get smoked the further they dig into his archives. he has said some shyt that's impossible to defend when used out of context. i wanna say he dont want that publicity, but i know he'll welcome it.

 

[valet]

The twitter quote is clear and Tucker showed it wasnt accurate. Now Tariw won with the Ben Carson quote. And if you listen to Tariq podcast you know that wasn't tongue and cheek. But if yall say he won then he won i guess

 

[AITheAnswerAI]

What's the difference? To me the only difference is that White Supremacist is more specific to who it's calling out.

A white supremacist is what most white people are, just looking out for white interests and playing down racism towards blacks. They just want to maintain their privilege(although they'll deny it when called out on it) and they fear black empowerment.

A racist gets more into calling blacks n****** and denying blacks jobs, denying blacks loans or not leasing to them simply because they "don't like n*****" supporting violence against blacks etc. etc.

So basically a racist is an exaggerated white supremacist.

 

[marcuz]

tucker was basically playing a dishonest word game. he said "associated" just like EVERY black person is associated with blacklivesmatter. we all know trump and his cabinet are associated with the alt right. anyone that has lurked pol over the years can attest to that.

tariq did well in this one, that happy kwanzaa sealed it going to donate to tariq now because hes about to take on a new level of harassment for this interview`

 

[satam55]

Can't lose when you mention white supremacy or white supremacist because 99.9% of whites believe they're superior to black people.

A racist is different than a white supremacist, learn the difference.

What's the difference? To me the only difference is that White Supremacist is more specific to who it's calling out.

A white supremacist is what most white people are, just looking out for white interests and playing down racism towards blacks. They just want to maintain their privilege(although they'll deny it when called out on it) and they fear black empowerment.

A racist gets more into calling blacks n****** and denying blacks jobs, denying blacks loans or not leasing to them simply because they "don't like n*****" supporting violence against blacks etc. etc.

So basically a racist is an exaggerated white supremacist.

To me you just described the difference between a covert & a overt Racist/White Supremacist. The 2 words still mean the same thing to me.

 

[bnm8907]

This nikka trash

At that cover. I hope that aint Peanut in the background

 

[LEEeveryday]

Tariq must be a fly in the ointment that they want to do something about... It's interesting how FOX got him on AGAIN while people diminish his profile, acting as tho he's a nobody..


I don't like how Tariq ran from the Art of Macking. He needs to own that as a point in time that he grew from.. He'd have a simply rebuttal by digging into the past of these suspected white supremacist and asking if their past makes who they are NOW as well...

It would be a circuitous debate at that point, but it would absolve him of having that mack shyt discredit his information now.

 

[LEEeveryday]

If they bring back Tariq and they bring up this




This nikka can flow

OMG....lmfao...geeez Tariq...


....this actually goes with the fact that Art of Macking was a satire and lends credence to his comedy angle ...

 

[freetroit]

To the guys saying he should not have said the book was satire

Do you guys remeber when richard spence was on roland martin adressing the alt right throwing nazi salute

He said it was done in good fun and exuberance

 

[LEEeveryday]

To the guys saying he should not have said the book was satire

Do you guys remeber when richard spence was on roland martin adressing the alt right throwing nazi salute

He said it was done in good fun and exuberance

word, that's what I'm saying....Tariq needs a arsenal of these situations for an easy rebuttal ...

 

[John Hull]

Ya'll going with the cac analogies and false equivalencies about racism and acting as if Tariq has to be some kind of saint just to call these mahfuggas out. Cac host gets to play dumb and pretend shyt is sweet, that's why ya'll hate Tariq cause he keeps re-iterating the FACTS. I realize now he's killing these honkies with facts that's why they are all up in his Twitter feed going ham.

You can take apart his presentation in a hostile environment if you like, but staying on code and calling these bytches what they are (white supremacists) is that ether that makes em burn slow

 

[Will Ross]

To the guys saying he should not have said the book was satire

Do you guys remeber when richard spence was on roland martin adressing the alt right throwing nazi salute

He said it was done in good fun and exuberance

He discredited his work for white people for no reason at all. When the pro black dollar stop making him money what is he going to say about hidden colors.