8 more posts and we'll be at 100 posts in between me asking you this same question and you sidestepping
Saying "theres a lot of research behind those pictures" doesnt answer my question. Again, how does a scientist pointing at a picture and telling you the picture is a real life representation of an object, prove his assertion true to an objective observer? If it doesnt prove his assertion then whats so hard about you saying that you DO believe SOME things without proof? Its either or. Instead you keep trying to sidestep
And pointing at a picture is exactly what they do. They pull up a picture and tell you it represents (yadda yadda yadda) and Im asking how do you PROVE their assertion since words on their own are not proof to YOU. You cant answer for your own logic without referring to my beliefs?