Klay and Steph with the Subliminal shots at LeBron

JLova

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
60,022
Reputation
4,652
Daps
182,374
Neither do I. But I'm not seeing it as some all time great performance for the ages either.

Dude was scoring half their points and contributing to like 70% of the points. A great performance in a losing effort.
 

OG_StankBrefs

Da Spice...
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,538
Reputation
6,749
Daps
98,678
Reppin
Caladan
If LBJ's the Bully than that must make LBJ Debo to their Craig. And we all know how Friday ended for Debo.

:sas1::sas2:


Gettin his life togetha and ended up being da President of da Federated Territories.

tinylister.jpg


:sas1:
 

Mars

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2014
Messages
10,197
Reputation
601
Daps
23,639
If you switched Curry with Lebron,Cleveland would have gotten sweeped.Probably lose in the second round to the bulls.Lets not forget that the cavs beat the bulls despite Jr smith missing the first 2 games at home,in addition to Love and Irving being injured.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
160,828
Reputation
32,575
Daps
545,921
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
LOL, you beat ANY team that way. :snoop: You people are completely irrational.

It's not "irrational". You can't say irrational in the same line where you say you beat any team that way. His wing players are for the most part spot up shooters when playing with Bron that can't create their shot. He's the only one on that team that can put it on the floor consistently without Kyrie. Lebron's jumper isn't wet like that and while he's starting to play in the post more, he still has work to do in that area.

I don't believe in asterisks per say, but you can't discount a team missing 2 all stars. Series shouldn't have gone this long.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,331
Daps
241,486
More proof of what I've been saying for a while. Warriors are just an incredibly balanced team top to bottom. Lotta shooting, lot of flex guys that can play multiple positions.

Honestly one of the weaker MVPs I can think of in a while
The proof is, this team wouldn't be shyt without Curry.
 

USSInsiders

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,302
Reputation
2,347
Daps
31,306
Reppin
NULL
The proof is, this team wouldn't be shyt without Curry.

We can make the same shytty argument with virtually any MVP candidate. No shyt he makes a big difference, but so does LeBron, so does Harden. Every team worth their salt has one or two guys that can dominate offensively.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,331
Daps
241,486
We can make the same shytty argument with virtually any MVP candidate. No shyt he makes a big difference, but so does LeBron, so does Harden. Every team worth their salt has one or two guys that can dominate offensively.
I fail to see how that's "more proof" of him failing to register a Finals MVP vote when the media was too busy dikkriding LeBron to notice what actual impact he had; only giving it to Iggy because he was the one to strike down their superhero, rather than vote for the player that had the most impact/output of all the players on that Warriors team.
 

USSInsiders

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
21,302
Reputation
2,347
Daps
31,306
Reppin
NULL
I fail to see how that's "more proof" of him failing to register a Finals MVP vote when the media was too busy dikkriding LeBron to notice what actual impact he had; only giving it to Iggy because he was the one to strike down their superhero, rather than vote for the player that had the most impact/output of all the players on that Warriors team.

Listen all of these media awards are just products of groupthink. I pay no mind to them, I just personally didn't think he deserved regular MVP because in my opinion the Warriors collective excellence made them great. Steph is very good player, and he stood out, but if you watch the warriors they just collectively dominate and destroy people. They ran the score up big time all season. People would come into their arena and get decimated constanty. I'm traditionally used to seeing MVPs being the guys that make the difference between winning and losing. More often than not Steph was the guy who made the different between the -15 getting covered or not, not the win. I think some of the writers saw some of that firsthand in the finals.

Obviously the award was a result of him being the best guy on the best team. I get it. Iggy got fmvp because he stood out prominently in the smaller lineup towards the end, defended LeBron well (no shyt, most people know he's arguably the best man-on-man pause defender in the league) and had those "defining" moments corny media cacs love to cling to.

I had the replay of game 6 playing in the background last night and I really was able to key in on some plays again. When the cavs blitzed the PNR and steph passed it to the post who then kicked it to the corner or kicked it to the roll man after the blitz (which was usually iggy) he'd basically have wide open shots to knock down, and they made them. Iggy and the other guys just made the shots they had to make consistently, and Iggy who's not a prolific jumpshooter by any means was able to knock down easy shots and capitalize on turnovers and push the break and finish (which he's always been great at.)

I think Kerr even mentioned that the cavs obviously took away their best guys and forced the others to beat them, and they did.

I honestly think the writers didn't know who the fukk to vote for, but again, it's another reason why I pay zero mind to their opinions cause more often than not they're totally clueless based on the questions they ask and the opinions they give.
 
Top