You’re welcomeBeing in a healthy relationship is about exchanging domestic services?
We'll you've schooled. Lol
You’re welcomeBeing in a healthy relationship is about exchanging domestic services?
We'll you've schooled. Lol
alot of men just want a mother that they can also have sex withBeing in a healthy relationship is about exchanging domestic services?
We'll you've schooled. Lol
I’m not alot of men.alot of men just want a mother that they can also have sex with
that's why they often put their mom first, before their wife and their kids.
If she wants to cook fine, If both of yall work its nothing to eat out and have somebody else do the cooking. same thing. demanding she stay home and cook is just momma boy babble.
I'm sureI love it!
In your quote it literally states what the issue is. Not sure why you chose it.Google:
The phrase "the way to a man's heart is through his stomach" is an idiom that suggests that a good way to a person's affection is by providing them with enjoyable food. While often attributed to cultural beliefs and outdated gender roles, the sentiment behind it, that shared meals and culinary experiences can be a powerful part of building relationships, still resonates with many people today.
It’s less about being a “good” woman and more about the effort being a reflection of how much you care about someone. I cook for my wife all the time and she does the same for me. Feeding someone is essentially keeping them alive. Why is it a bad thing in your opinion?
It doesn't have to be but it is.I think gender roles are incredibly hard to unlearn
At the same time, it's natural to want to do this (at least occasionally) for a man you really like and doesn't neccesarily have to be a gender performance thing
Maybe your should look up what domestic labor entails. You're literally restating my argument in the form of an question.How is that domestic labor? She’s showing her dude affection!
She can do whatever she wants.So she can’t do something nice for him? Maybe she LIKES to cook? Some women love to make a meal and see the appreciation on their man’s face.
Of course you don't.Everyone has their own unique love language. I don't see the issue in expressing it in this manner
It was joke.Cooking dinnerhands and knee’s barefoot scrubbing toilets
Describing dinner as “labor” says more about you than her lol

You get it.alot of men just want a mother that they can also have sex with
that's why they often put their mom first, before their wife and their kids.
If she wants to cook fine, If both of yall work its nothing to eat out and have somebody else do the cooking. same thing. demanding she stay home and cook is just momma boy babble.
I also think men who don't have a lot of early relationships, (like back in highschool early)You get it.
My statement was more about women's feelings about themselves than a criticism of men or relationships though.
There are many ways to exist as a good partner outside of domestic labor. I just wish more women understood that.
In your quote it literally states what the issue is. Not sure why you chose it.
I didn't say cooking is an issue. I said that I hate that women think that it makes them "good" women ie your are not worthy of love unless you are laboring.

Good point.I also think men who don't have a lot of early relationships, (like back in highschool early)
They develop unreasonable expectations, and don't really know how to just be happy with a person simply because you like them and they like you.
Nobody was expecting their highschool sweetheart to cook for them and yet the puppy love was still strong back then.
Its these dudes that didn't get any play until their late 20s early 30s, talking about domestic duties because they need somebody to the place of the mothers role that they no longer have in their life. at the very least the timing of those changes in expectation is very coincidental

The quote talks about it as an outdated gender role does it not? That was the point.The quote doesn’t say anything about being a good woman and says despite it being an outdated saying (due to gender roles) the sentiment still rings true that people are able to build relationships through sharing a meal with another person.
Men are expected to protect and provide. Both are a labor of love. When did it become a bad thing to do something for someone you care about?
![]()
But if you don't think cooking is labor then why do chefs and cooks get paid
I hate how women think they need to turn to domestic labor to prove they are "good" women.
maybe she likes cooking for the man. Even taking it outside of gender it's a very human thing to enjoy someone enjoying a meal you madeNot equivalent but okay.The same reason why nba players get paid for playing basketball while the rest of us play at the local gym
One is a skilled position where you have to cook for dozens of people per hour, while cooking some spaghetti and catfish once or twice a week is just simply dinner
maybe she likes cooking for the man. Even taking it outside of gender it's a very human thing to enjoy someone enjoying a meal you made
Everybody don't view cooking for their spouse as pejorative domestic labor