To illustrate how he felt at the time. Which was again backed up by his other comments - "The staredown & trying to talk mess @ the end of the game like that, it's like alright, u realize u see us next Fri. We’ve got to send a message to them when they come to our building". I wouldn't say it's hypocritical as much as it was reacting to what happened. There's probably part of him that took offense because he played like shyt.
It is when you're claiming that the Warriors aren't exactly the epitome of class, yet only ONE player spoke about it - not the entire team - a player who doesn't really mouth off (unless provoked) or celebrate as the Bucks did.
. I'm sure every member of the Bucks wasn't behaving exactly the same but he didn't single out the worst offenders, he referenced the whole unit. He rides with nikkas that talk shyt and do all kinds of demonstrative shyt (and does his share). Class is all about not responding when provoked.Is it really hypocritical when we don't know what was said?
He wasn't referencing the whole unit - probably best to read next time breh -He's on the team though
You win all bets are off, you got the right to celebrate how you want. If the situation was reversed, like it likely will be tomorrow and some Bucks were crying about "class" you and others would be saying 
"You shoulda beat them then :Rileysheadonumad:" and rightfully so.
Of course you do. But you can't accuse him of being hypocritical when we don't know what went down on the court after the game. You'd have an argument if they were just celebrating a win - but Klay specifically said SOME of them (I take it as the ones talking some shyt). Klay would only be a hypocrite if he said something similar to an opposing team in a similar situation - referencing a picture where he's sticking his tongue out after hitting a three isn't hypocritical.
So now he gotta name names? It's not a blanket statement, he said "some of those guys" not the whole unit like you were referring to.
Of course you do. But you can't accuse him of being hypocritical when we don't know what went down on the court. You'd have an argument if they were just celebrating a win - but Klay specifically said SOME of them (I take it as the ones talking some shyt). Klay would only be a hypocrite if he said something similar to an opposing team in a similar situation - referencing him sticking his tongue out after hitting a three isn't hypocritical.
So now he gotta name names? It's not a blanket statement, he said "some of those guys" not the whole unit like you were referring to.
Nope, that doesn't make him a hypocrite. He can celebrate how he chooses as every other team can, however since we don't know what was said by "some" of the players towards Klay and/or his team - you and others can't say he's hypocritical (much less the rest of the team when they didn't say shyt about class) as if he's guilty of saying something similar.
Nope, that doesn't make him a hypocrite. He can celebrate how he chooses as every other team can, however since we don't know what was said by "some" of the players towards Klay and/or his team - you and others can't say he's hypocritical (much less the rest of the team when they didn't say shyt about class) as if he's guilty of saying something similar.
For all we know the ones in question could've said some 'you're bytchass halfbreed fakkit who's never going to win shyt again in his life.' type shyt.
He said "some of those guys". We don't need to be stretching this point out more than that, just because you didn't read the quote properly.
. I've made my point about the blanket statement clear and there is no real rebuttal.It isn't as simple as that and you know it. We don't know what was said nor should you reference pictures of them celebrating threes as if it's a branch of hypocrisy. I don't particularly like it when a player uses "class" in sports either (it's beyond corny), but I'm not going to call one a hypocrite if I don't know whether or not he's guilty of doing/saying something similar. Nor am I going to infer that a whole team can't be talking about "class", when only ONE player actually brought it up, and then again post pictures of them celebrating after hitting a shot.
Stretching the point is you sayingStretching the point is making up quotes and talking about everything but class
When the direct quote was - "We thought at the time they could have won with a little more class some of those guys, but I'd have been fired up too." And then trying to argue semantics about how he didn't single anyone out, as if "some of those guys" isn't valid enough.
