Kneega

[Poitier]

IG thot market is saturated...too many hoes for the same power nikkas with $$$. They can't all be married with rich famous nikkas and live as a trophy wife with them, that's impossible.

They don't advertise their bodies for the typical dry-dikks, simps and minimum wage men. These dudes are invisible to them. They give zero fukks about their comments or how they would eat their asses with a dedicated effort.

Only other way IG thots can make money is to bank off women, who make the majority of instagram's userbase. To these women, IG thots, with their pics of their vacations, food plates, etc can sell to them a image of the ''young pretty carefree independant women with means who is enjoying life'', this is the kind of persona women would love to emulate. Powerful images of a exciting lifestyle with glamour, alcohol, louis vuitton bags, beaches, etc tempt the women.

Most Ig thot followers are not simps or men, they are women. Women who envy them and want to be like them. At the end of the day most women dont care about dudes or their opinions, dreams or fears like that. They first and foremost care about what other women do, think and say. And being a IG thot ''model'' is what is popular among young women 18-30 so they follow the trend. Women are catty and competitive, so they want to be better than the IG thot they follow. But at the end they just copy each other.

Selling dreams and images to women who are often prone to self-doubt, catiness and envy towards other women. Thats essentially what social media is. Thats where the real money is. Not for nothing that 85% of all consumer purchases is done by women. You prey on their nature and exploit it efficiently for profits.

 

[Dwolf]

Why have a instagram anyway? None of these chicks pics are private

 

[⠝⠕⠏⠑]

I gotta stop liking attention seeking women pictures on Instagram.

We criticize them for looking like giant bratz dolls but that insecure girl with daddy issues only did it because that’s what men online glorify.

It’s not healthy for a mans mind nor does it promote positive behavior for the insecure ig model picture that I’m always liking.

From now on I’m only liking pictures that actually interest me.

I just needed to put this out in the universe because I noticed me and my boys are basically showing admiration for watered down soft core porn on ig. It’s pathetic.

Can’t be out here yelling talking about where the natural girls at!? Where the non attention whores at when that’s all that celebrated on ig.

That is all.

Reinforcement is different from causing something to happen. That sounds smart/dumb but it's true.

Men might reinforce this behavior with attention but they didn't cause or create it...
Does that make sense ya'll?
Lol! Some shyt sounds crazy in my head sometimes.

There's nothing wrong with liking attention and getting paid from it. (Get that money girl!)

The problem is when u NEED attention. (Girl sit the fukk down!) The origin is usually a lil unhealthy. Also dudes look b/c it's there...or am I missing something.

Men are hypocritical in some ways just like women are but I don't think this is one of those instances babe...

 

[videogamestashbox.com]

We As Men Are Hypocrites​

The 10 fundamental flaws of the western intellectual canon
(a work in progress)​

#4 of 10 Contradiction

• Difference under a principle is based on structural distinction

This is the inverse of #3. There is no such thing as contradiction & hypocrisy in any real sense ...now in a hypothetical(analytical framework) sense sure. It can be quite handy as a rule of thumb to catch certain types of phenomena. That said If an entity behaves differently in it's interactions with the world it's because of structural distinctions(both physical, social, & cognitive) in the entity itself, the different things it interacts with, and the medium those interactions take place in(both physical, social, & cognitive). If an entity reacts differently in different circumstances the question isn't one of contradiction & hypocrisy the question is what are the distinctions that brings about those distinct reactions.

Example:

1. Two 5lb balls of the same material.
2. Ball 1 is constructed in the form of a small ball(volume) while ball 2 is constructed in the form of a large ball(volume)
3. Each ball is dropped on a load barring(2lb) structure(plank) suspended over water. Each breaking the structure.
4. Each ball falls in the water. Ball 1 sinks into the water ...Ball 2 floats on the water.

The water OBVIOUSLY isn't being contradictory & hypocritical. It reacts distinctly in relation to the balls because each is structurally(volume) distinct in a way that causes distinctions in their interactions with the water ...even though they shared a structural(weight) similarity that caused them to interact with the plank the same. I assert that this carries over to social & cognitive realities as well. The goal is to identify these distinctions & similarities in phenomena along with their interactions in various medium to come to a better understanding of reality(physical, social, & cognitive) in all forms.






#3 of 10 Universal Principle

• Principles are only universal to a locality

This is the inverse of #4. Everything can not be a universal principle. Principles are bound to a locality in which the universality exist. Those same principles(lesser) exist within larger principles(greater)...think of a circle within a circle. that give shape to the behavioral properties of the lesser while the lesser complementary gives shape to the behavioral properties of the greater(which is essentially the picture painted in #4). Other Principles are parallel principle(lesser) existing beside each other within a larger principle(greater). There is no reason to expect or demand that what goes on in one principle should also occur in a parallel principle.

Example:

1. Four balls of the same weight, volume, and material.
2. Balls 1 & 2 are dropped in water contained in a bucket and both float without touching the floor of the container.
3. The same bucket of water is poured onto the floor.
4. Balls 3 & 4 are dropped in the same water but contained on the surface then both bounce up after touching the floor of the surface.

While it is the same water in each case, the water isn't breaking some universal principle by reacting to balls 3 & 4 distinct to how it reacted to balls 1 & 2. The principle by which the water reacts is dependent on the properties defined by the locality. I assert that this carries over to social & cognitive realities as well. The goal is to identify these distinctions & similarities in phenomena along with their interactions in various medium to come to a better understanding of reality(physical, social, & cognitive) in all forms.

Hypocrisy =......by and large IDGAF if someone thinks that I am. I don't subscribe to the idea anyway
Now acknowledging that I exist in a social environment where others live by the idea ...short of small adjustments for that environment IDGAF​

 

[dap-man]

Taking accountability 4 ur self & ur behavior?
I can't be Mad at that.

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

I never like them heaux's pics

when I'm on IG, it's mostly for the scenery

I love to follow the pages with ppl traveling all around the world and snapping pics of these beautiful places

leave your city sometimes breh. It's really a beautiful earth outchea