Knowingly Exposing Others to HIV, No Longer a Felony in California

[Doobie Doo]

What kind of people would support this?
If you have HIV you don't need to be donating blood, and if you sex with a person and do not disclose that you have HIV than you need to go to prison. Plain and simple.

If you put a condom on you can legally have sex without disclosing. The law only applies to unprotected sex

 

[AJD]

When brehs see that Georgia next

 

[The Connoisseurs]

Is this the new method for the population control agenda

 

[Afrodroid]

"who want some of this tiger blood??....."

:magicj:

 

[SmallWars]

@skeetsinternal

 

[The Wolf Among You]

If you put a condom on you can legally have sex without disclosing. The law only applies to unprotected sex

They need to reverse this bullshyt and then update it to be both protected and unprotected.

 

[Let A Fro Be A Fro]

Modern medicine allows those with HIV to live longer lives and nearly eliminates the possibility of transmission, according to state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblyman Todd Gloria (D-San Diego), authors of the bill.

Supporters of the bill said women engaging in prostitution are disproportionately targeted with criminal charges, even in cases where the infection is not transmitted.

Sure people can live longer with HIV...if they can pay at least four figures per month for the medication.

The Cost of HIV Treatment

Lots of people in the forum talk about the advancement in LGBT political power(especially in relation to the lack of advancement in Black political power). Most are sleeping on how much power "sex workers" have gotten in the same time frame.

 

[Nintendough]

I hate fakkits and the fakkit agenda.

 

[Deflatedhoopdreams]

Modern medicine allows those with HIV to live longer lives and nearly eliminates the possibility of transmission, according to state Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) and Assemblyman Todd Gloria (D-San Diego), authors of the bill.

Supporters of the bill said women engaging in prostitution are disproportionately targeted with criminal charges, even in cases where the infection is not transmitted.

Republican lawmakers including Sen. Joel Anderson of Alpine voted against the bill, arguing it puts the public at risk.

“I’m of the mind that if you purposefully inflict another with a disease that alters their lifestyle the rest of their life, puts them on a regimen of medications to maintain any kind of normalcy, it should be a felony,” Anderson said during the floor debate. “It’s absolutely crazy to me that we should go light on this.”




Sh!t like this is example #9832685636526565 why I question folks' voting Democrat so blindly. The pasted above is just a microcosm example of the difference between liberals and conservatives when it comes to basic morality and ethics.

 

[Yade]

What kind of people would support this?
If you have HIV you don't need to be donating blood, and if you sex with a person and do not disclose that you have HIV than you need to go to prison. Plain and simple.

I think one of the law dudes who tried getting it passed was gay

 

[Knowledge]

This is some sick shyt. I predict America falling just like the Roman empire

 

[Jamal514]

I hate fakkits and the fakkit agenda.

They won’t rest until everyone has been turned out.

 

[Doobie Doo]

They need to reverse this bullshyt and then update it to be both protected and unprotected.

It's not that I disagree however when it comes to the legality of sex it comes down to He said she said. If you said you had on a condom and they said you didn't then who is lying?

 

[Nintendough]

They won’t rest until everyone has been turned out.

Life was better when they knew they were freaks and we allowed them to have they own thing and we didnt bother each other unless we wanted to.

 

[Po pimp]

As I stated in my original post, Marc Lamont Hill agreed with not making it a felony, and a lot of his followers were disagreeing with him. I think he may have finally jumped the shark with this one. Here’s what he said:

I agree with this. Obviously, I believe that people should be transparent and honest about their status. I'm just not convinced that criminalization is the answer to our problems. (As an abolitionist, I'mma say that about everything!) If KNOWINGLY exposing people to HIV will lead you prison, people will stop getting tested so that they have plausible deniability. This will lead to a greater public health crisis. Also, I worry that the act of criminalization takes all responsibility from the other partner with regard to safety, testing, protection, etc. Thoughts?