Yes, Ricky Rubio trying to make a running 3 against the clock is not a high percentage play. That doesn't mean the refs should essentially walk off the court with two seconds left to play in the game.
Anyone who has watched the NBA in the last 15 years knows that the majority of these calls are going to go in the Lakers favor so I don't think anyone in their right mind is going to complain about that non-call or even question it. Its just the way it is. Rubio is a 79% shooter. Mathematically he should make 3/3 49% of the time. Thats hardly the impossibility you're making it out to be.
man shut up
this is nothing but you doing your standard "i hate the lakers and kobe bryant" crybaby routine
and quit with the hyperbole, I never said it was an impossibility. In one of my posts I even pointed out a 10% shooter could make three straight, so obviously I'm aware it's possible for Rubio to. I said the majority of the time he does not make all three which is fact.
Stop being ridiculous, anyone who watches the NBA period knows the refs tend to swallow their whistles at the end of the game. I get it you're butthurt that the Lakers won and the refs didn't blow the whistle on a game tying three attempt they'd rarely blow the whistle on. If the roles were reversed and it was Kobe shooting you wouldn't be in here acting like a bytch. You'd probably be agreeing with me, that the refs rarely calling a foul there.
about it at this point like it is what it is.
it was basically a coin flip.
"
To continue with your overly literal and poorly representative use of the word, passing to Kobe in any situation is a dumb idea because he misses a majority of his shots.


nikkas talking about % when the nikka clearly got fouled.
we escaped. 