Kobe Stans... They Not Gonna Like This

waltthizzney

All Star
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
3,949
Reputation
-4,760
Daps
11,218
Reppin
NULL
find me one NBA player that says Curry>Kobe

Hell find me one NBA player that isn't a kobe stan
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,735
Reputation
10,059
Daps
111,519
Reppin
Brooklyn
after they split what happened¿

who got 2 more rings as a #1option¿

& who got one more ring playing the supporting role and was never a #1 option again¿

*
So you’re arguing that 33 year old Shaq should’ve won more after 2004 than 26 year old Kobe, effectively stating that even at his advanced age, he should have still won more after they were done as teammates having already played an extra 4 nba seasons and had 3 years in college. I also agree that Shaq was definitively a better player overall, but that’s kinda unrealistic :troll:
 

LebronsJumper

All Star
Joined
Dec 1, 2017
Messages
840
Reputation
240
Daps
5,421
Curry's game is like watching a 3pt contest

Watching Kobe was a spectacle, and this is coming from a bron stan :manny:
 

010101

C L O N E*0690//////
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
87,100
Reputation
21,610
Daps
230,912
Reppin
uptXwn***///***///
Call Kobe a 1b when he was the clearcut 2nd option when Shaq was on the floor and was obviously not as good on the biggest stage. :mjlol:

Shaq got 3 FMVPs while Kobe was sulking in the corner :mjlol:
why did they chose kobe over shaq¿

how many rings do the lakers get with 09/10 shaq as the #1 option¿

*
 

Jordan>>LeFrozen

It was written in the Bible
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
13,591
Reputation
859
Daps
49,321
Reppin
NYC
Shaq got 3 FMVPs while Kobe was sulking in the corner :mjlol:

262699196a42c44f06cb183b9c031c13--la-lakers-kobe-bryant.jpg


Kobe surely was sulking wasnt he?
:mjlol:
 

010101

C L O N E*0690//////
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
87,100
Reputation
21,610
Daps
230,912
Reppin
uptXwn***///***///
So you’re arguing that 33 year old Shaq should’ve won more after 2004 than 26 year old Kobe, effectively stating that even at his advanced age, he should have still won more after they were done as teammates having already played an extra 4 nba seasons and had 3 years in college. I also agree that Shaq was definitively a better player overall, but that’s kinda unrealistic :troll:
you are satisfied with that excuse¿*
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,301
Daps
241,483
I don't think it exactly works that way. You're saying Curry can still maintain his level of efficiency with Ass players? Really?
Yes.

No perimeter player in the history of the game had to deal with more defensive attention than he did (prior to Durant arriving). Dudes quickly forget that outside of Klay, the Warriors didn't have any other great talent on offense in 2015/16. Draymond was the only player who averaged double digits and even he capitalized off all the open looks he got from his man being worried about Curry.
 

Jordan>>LeFrozen

It was written in the Bible
Joined
Jun 1, 2012
Messages
13,591
Reputation
859
Daps
49,321
Reppin
NYC
Yes.

No perimeter player in the history of the game had to deal with more defensive attention than he did (prior to Durant arriving). Dudes quickly forget that outside of Klay, the Warriors didn't have any other great talent on offense in 2015/16. Draymond was the only player who averaged double digits and even he capitalized off all the open looks he got from his man being worried about Curry.

I dont think you can compare a great warriors team to a team like the mid 2000s lakers. There was no klay, no No bench to score 40 points in a game 1, no Andre off the bench to be FMVP. Steph on a ass team like the lakers has to do much more
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,754
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,256
Reppin
NULL
I don't think it exactly works that way. You're saying Curry can still maintain his level of efficiency with Ass players? Really?

Umm yeah. Curry already showed that his shooting ability warps defenses outward and changes how defenses have to guard him. Draymond wasn't a "good" shooter in 2015-16, Curry just drew so much attention that teams would live with letting him take the three.

Oh geez, I wonder how a guy like Trevor Ariza would looking shooting the three when the floor is spaced with Curry, Fisher, Gasol, and Odom out there? Oh wait, we've seen how Ariza looks with the kinda Curry-Esque spacing available and he looks like a damn sharpshooter with Harden.

Even if Curry loses a shyt ton of efficiency, he'd still be on another planet of efficiency than Kobe. You must not be understanding this but comparing Kobe and Curry's efficiency is like comparing Lebron and Melo. Even if Lebron lost a shyt ton of efficiency and chucked, he'd still be much higher. Y'all acting like the difference in efficiency is some tiny difference but it's not.
 

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

I’m here for the scraps
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
33,735
Reputation
10,059
Daps
111,519
Reppin
Brooklyn
Umm yeah. Curry already showed that his shooting ability warps defenses outward and changes how defenses have to guard him. Draymond wasn't a "good" shooter in 2015-16, Curry just drew so much attention that teams would live with letting him take the three.

Oh geez, I wonder how a guy like Trevor Ariza would looking shooting the three when the floor is spaced with Curry, Fisher, Gasol, and Odom out there? Oh wait, we've seen how Ariza looks with the kinda Curry-Esque spacing available and he looks like a damn sharpshooter with Harden.

Even if Curry loses a shyt ton of efficiency, he'd still be on another planet of efficiency than Kobe. You must not be understanding this but comparing Kobe and Curry's efficiency is like comparing Lebron and Melo. Even if Lebron lost a shyt ton of efficiency and chucked, he'd still be much higher. Y'all acting like the difference in efficiency is some tiny difference but it's not.
Curry shoots better from deep on the career than Kobe did from the field altogether while having as bad a shot selection as Kobe had, if not worse, but dudes want to argue that he wouldn’t be as efficient? This is a joke :laughingphil:
 

Raw Lyrics

Sunset Park
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
8,242
Reputation
3,840
Daps
31,022
Reppin
Brooklyn
Yes.

No perimeter player in the history of the game had to deal with more defensive attention than he did (prior to Durant arriving). Dudes quickly forget that outside of Klay, the Warriors didn't have any other great talent on offense in 2015/16. Draymond was the only player who averaged double digits and even he capitalized off all the open looks he got from his man being worried about Curry.


I respectfully disagree. I'm of the opinion that if you surround Curry with trash players, something Klay nor Green have never been, his efficiency would go down.

Feel free to have the last word.
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,754
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,256
Reppin
NULL
And I like how we're ignoring that Curry is a far more willing and dangerous passer than Kobe. Curry's gravity and quick decision making allows him to create so many easy opportunities for his teammates.

The ability to get your teammates touches and make them feel like part of the offense is vital rather than just telling them to grab boards from your missed shots. Curry is a better off-ball player, passer, and playmaker than Kobe too if we keeping it a stack.

Kobe got a better (More willing) mid-range game, a much better post game, is a better finisher, and a much better on-ball defender.
 

Raw Lyrics

Sunset Park
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
8,242
Reputation
3,840
Daps
31,022
Reppin
Brooklyn
Curry is not a better NBA player than Kobe Bryant, Idaf what the %s say.

Curry is a 47% career fg shooter...that number will go down as he progresses in age. Kobe is a career 45% shooter.

Curry is a better shooter than Kobe, he is NOT a better basketball player. And I say that as a person who would always bytch about Kobe's shot selection.

Ya muthaphukas smoking crack if you think Curry is a better NBA player than Kobe.

I'm out this goddamn thread.
 

Draje

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,754
Reputation
3,434
Daps
60,256
Reppin
NULL
I respectfully disagree. I'm of the opinion that if you surround Curry with trash players, something Klay nor Green have never been, his efficiency would go down.

Feel free to have the last word.

Wanna compare Klay and Gasol then Odom and Dray's playoff stats then compare the efficiency of Kobe and Curry? :ohhh:

Wanna pull up Kobe's efficiency with Prime Shaq? Or with Payton and Malone? Or with Dwight, Nash, and Gasol? :ohhh:

You pick Kobe's best years for efficiency and let's compare? :ohhh:
 
Top