waltthizzney
All Star
find me one NBA player that says Curry>Kobe
Hell find me one NBA player that isn't a kobe stan
Hell find me one NBA player that isn't a kobe stan
So you’re arguing that 33 year old Shaq should’ve won more after 2004 than 26 year old Kobe, effectively stating that even at his advanced age, he should have still won more after they were done as teammates having already played an extra 4 nba seasons and had 3 years in college. I also agree that Shaq was definitively a better player overall, but that’s kinda unrealisticafter they split what happened¿
who got 2 more rings as a #1option¿
& who got one more ring playing the supporting role and was never a #1 option again¿
*


why did they chose kobe over shaq¿Call Kobe a 1b when he was the clearcut 2nd option when Shaq was on the floor and was obviously not as good on the biggest stage.
Shaq got 3 FMVPs while Kobe was sulking in the corner![]()
Shaq got 3 FMVPs while Kobe was sulking in the corner![]()

you are satisfied with that excuse¿*So you’re arguing that 33 year old Shaq should’ve won more after 2004 than 26 year old Kobe, effectively stating that even at his advanced age, he should have still won more after they were done as teammates having already played an extra 4 nba seasons and had 3 years in college. I also agree that Shaq was definitively a better player overall, but that’s kinda unrealistic![]()
Yes.I don't think it exactly works that way. You're saying Curry can still maintain his level of efficiency with Ass players? Really?
Yes.
No perimeter player in the history of the game had to deal with more defensive attention than he did (prior to Durant arriving). Dudes quickly forget that outside of Klay, the Warriors didn't have any other great talent on offense in 2015/16. Draymond was the only player who averaged double digits and even he capitalized off all the open looks he got from his man being worried about Curry.
I don't think it exactly works that way. You're saying Curry can still maintain his level of efficiency with Ass players? Really?
Curry shoots better from deep on the career than Kobe did from the field altogether while having as bad a shot selection as Kobe had, if not worse, but dudes want to argue that he wouldn’t be as efficient? This is a joke :laughingphil:Umm yeah. Curry already showed that his shooting ability warps defenses outward and changes how defenses have to guard him. Draymond wasn't a "good" shooter in 2015-16, Curry just drew so much attention that teams would live with letting him take the three.
Oh geez, I wonder how a guy like Trevor Ariza would looking shooting the three when the floor is spaced with Curry, Fisher, Gasol, and Odom out there? Oh wait, we've seen how Ariza looks with the kinda Curry-Esque spacing available and he looks like a damn sharpshooter with Harden.
Even if Curry loses a shyt ton of efficiency, he'd still be on another planet of efficiency than Kobe. You must not be understanding this but comparing Kobe and Curry's efficiency is like comparing Lebron and Melo. Even if Lebron lost a shyt ton of efficiency and chucked, he'd still be much higher. Y'all acting like the difference in efficiency is some tiny difference but it's not.
Yes.
No perimeter player in the history of the game had to deal with more defensive attention than he did (prior to Durant arriving). Dudes quickly forget that outside of Klay, the Warriors didn't have any other great talent on offense in 2015/16. Draymond was the only player who averaged double digits and even he capitalized off all the open looks he got from his man being worried about Curry.


I respectfully disagree. I'm of the opinion that if you surround Curry with trash players, something Klay nor Green have never been, his efficiency would go down.
Feel free to have the last word.


