Since you claim to be such a basketball historian, surely you know that it is advantageous to be bigger and taller than the competition in basketball. You know there was a reason why people initially doubted Jordan because before him, teams never won without a dominant big man in the paint. Over the long run, taking lots of shots close to the basket has been more efficient than taking a lot of shots from outside.
If you can give Shaq 20 shots close to the basket and he can make 12, or you can give Kobe 20 shots from all over the floor and he can make 8 or 9, it's simple science Brodie. Shaq is clearly the better option. That's why teams chose to limit Shaq's paint touches as much as possible and roll the dice with Kobe's chucking.
SO IN ESSENCE, U SAYIN SHAQ WOULD BE A BETTER OPTION THAN MJ.
SMH STOP
Jordan would make 10 or 11 shots out of 20 and can also distribute. They were both unstoppable and they were both better options than Kobe.
No dumbass. I'm not suggesting that field goal % is the sole determinant of efficiency. I'm saying that Jordan and Shaq were clearly more efficient scoring options than Kobe was. Jordan vs. Shaq is a tougher call.BUT MJ SHOT ABOUT 10% LESS THAN SHAQ, SO NOW U JUS MOVIN THE GOALPOST LIKE THE BIITCHMADE FUCCBOY U ARE.. SO IF SHAQ SHOT 10% HIGHER THAN MJ, THEN SHAQ WAS A STRONGER OPTION, BY YOUR RATIONALE.. DUMBASS
Can we get a tally of stats on who snitched and was suspected of cheating on their wife with white trash?
You cant "snitch" on a cop
![]()
Shaq teamed up with the guys who target, profile, and slaughter black males with no repercussions
Shaq potentially being a snitch doesn't make Tobe any less of a snitch. And besides Shaq never cheated on his significant other with white trash.You cant "snitch" on a cop
![]()
Shaq teamed up with the guys who target, profile, and slaughter black males with no repercussions
Take a nap my guy, Tobe don't care about you defending his honor.There were
/
Take a nap my guy, Tobe don't care about you defending his honor.

I thought y'all said that Lebron's overall playoff stats don't matter because finals is the most important barometer since it's the biggest stage.
That's nice. Now how bout you show me how many MVP's and FMVP's he won without Kobe?So you're comparing Kobe from 25-31 years old to Shaq at 34 and older? You don't think it's even a little disingenuous or lazy to try that angle? Shaq from 25 to 31? An MVP award, 3 titles, 3 finals MVP awards in a row. On that note, let's look at both of them at 34. At that age, Shaq was celebrating a title. Kobe at 34? Well, look at my avi
Edit: you're gonna complain about the 2006 ring but not the refs in game 7 against the Blazers in 2000 or game 6 against the Kings in 2002?![]()

You stans stay deflecting. Act like anyone wins the MVP in their first 4 seasons or beyond their 13th season. The lakers were Shaq's team his entire prime. He was the top dog and the best player, clear as the water on a Caribbean beach, and it burned snitchbe up so much he went and sabotaged them in 2003 and 2004 trying to take the team from Shaq. You're sitting here trying to argue that Shaq in his mid 30's wasn't what a player in his late 20's is somehow puts snitchbe ahead of the diesel. Please bring something rational to your argument next timeThat's nice. Now how bout you show me how many MVP's and FMVP's he won without Kobe?![]()

