Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
The only part I strongly disagree with is her defending Tulsi Gabbard. Tulsi really is a Trump/Russia/Assad/Modi apologist with questionable motivations.
Krystal Ball-Russian plant test
- Thread starter Dusty Bake Activate
- Start date
The only part I strongly disagree with is her defending Tulsi Gabbard. Tulsi really is a Trump/Russia/Assad/Modi apologist with questionable motivations.
Prince.Skeletor
Don’t Be Like He-Man
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
Prince.Skeletor
Don’t Be Like He-Man
No answer thats what i thought
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
She meets with Assad other US politicians have met (Pelosi). She is sympathetic to Modi who Obama called a friend and is a US ally and she was 2 days later than Pelosi on wanting to impeach Trump. So she is either a Russian plant or is secretly trying to get Trump re-elected. Take off your tin foil hat please!
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Wrong? Nothing really. But she has publicly backed Assad and Modi, very strongly, and with no real reason why. She said that there's nothing in the transcript that warrants an impeachment inquiry which is impossible. She only reversed her decision after she got challenged at home. She clearly doesn't bring anything to the debate, to policy, or to her own platform.
It's some suspicious positions and not enough things that are "right" to make her a viable candidate.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
She has not publicly backed Assad, she met with him when invited by him. The end.
And her reason for backing Modi is the same as Obama's, India is our ally in the region. She also planned a yoga day with him and she disagreed with the fact he wasn't granted a visa to travel here. Is that 'strong' support? Not really.
And she is the most anti-interventionist candidate a policy that resonates with both Democrats, Independents and Republicans. Let the electorate decide if she brings anything to the table. She no less viable than a lot of candidates still in the race.
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
Lol what do you mean no answer? I called her a Trump/Russia/Assad/Modi apologist with questionable motivations in the OP bruh. If you don’t know any of what I’m referring to, google is your friend.
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
When several news shows has asked repeatedly if Assad is a enemy, rival, antagonist to the US, she is quite silent. Or quickly spins off in another direction.
That never works on this board.
The same as Obama? You mean that like Tulsi, Obama is Indian and held very conservative Hindi views up until prez election run?
I am part of the electorate. And I'm deciding she brings nothing to the table. The rest of the electorate feels the same. Hence she barely qualified for the debate this time around.
Dusty Bake Activate
Fukk your corny debates
She put this out immediately after the Barr summary and called it the Mueller report.
Then she said this after the Ukraine whistleblower.
Tulsi Gabbard: Transcript doesn't show 'compelling' case for impeachment
Yeah and...
Democrat Tulsi Gabbard defends 'frank and positive' Trump meeting
I’m not sure she would vote for the Dem nominee over Trump.
Prince.Skeletor
Don’t Be Like He-Man
This is UNTRUE to the maxxxxx and sounds like talking points that someone else said.
She has said several times that Assad is a brutal dictator, this has been said multiple times and she has compared him to being a brutal dictator just like gadaffi and sadam, so again that is untrue.
She is just saying that we need to define what an enemy to the united states is. Since Assad does not represent a threat to the united states he is not an enemy.
it is quite simple.
Bro i've seen you post before, you are way smarter and better than this. This here is cheap breh
This is untrue.
if you look at mainstream media they all dislike her and run smear campaigns against her, however almost all of progressive media outlets except for Ana on TyT all got nothing but love for Tulsi.
And everything that you mentioned, which is all easily refutable, are just talking points that mainstream media(the media not to be trusted) is saying.
She brings nothing to the table?
NOTHING to the table?
A president is also commander and chief and she and Pete are the ONLY two with military experience.
You want free healthcare, you gotta pay for that, how about that military industrial complex money? You think that can help by reducing America's global military footprint? Yes maybe?
Climate change? How can anyone be serious about climate change without talking about a corrupt oil-driven foreign policy?
Who else is serious about climate change? She is THE strongest on that point by far.
Who do you support in this race?
Secure Da Bag
Veteran
Warren, Bernie, Marianne.