Inspired by a NNL discussion I just saw and this scout talking sh!t
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...o-says-hed-take-39-other-point-guards-instead
I personally think it depends on the type of team you have, but I'd probably go with Rondo if I need a pure PG and Kyire if I need a scoring PG.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...o-says-hed-take-39-other-point-guards-instead
Three years ago, I was the only scout saying Rondo is overrated, and I was crucified for it. I was saying he was awful. I think he's a selfish player. He's only going to pass it to you if he thinks he can get an assist. I've seen him come out for pregame warm-ups with his shoes untied, shooting lefty foul shots. For him to come out for a game with that attitude makes me question his work ethic. I've never liked his game.
If you play with [URL='http://espn.go.com/nba/player/_/id/261/kevin-garnett']Kevin Garnett
[/URL], Paul Pierce and Ray Allen at close to their peak, they're going to raise everyone's game. Defensively, Rondo's a bit of a gambler, and I don't think his defense is all that. If I was starting a team and had my choice of any point guard, he would be 40th. I mean it. I'd take some backups before him.
I personally think it depends on the type of team you have, but I'd probably go with Rondo if I need a pure PG and Kyire if I need a scoring PG.






