Yet another faulty premise. Did Bron go out like a bytch in the 2011 Finals? Yes. Was he lookingagainst SA last year? Yes. Did Kobe look any better against PHX, DET, BOS? (his squad was heavily favored against DET and favored against BOS like that matters but still people like to bring it up when it suit there agenda and they were up 3-1 against PHX)
The reality is that Bron and Kobe have a comparable amount of 40 pt playoff games (with one guy playing 7 fewer years), Bron has better elimination game numbers, and he's been asked to do what Kobe does and more in the course of winning his two rings. Kobe's rep as this assassin, killer, ice water in his veins type nikka is based on winning rings early and the confidence that he projects. While Bron's rep as a choker or a guy who wilts under pressure is based upon him not winning rings early and him biting his nails.
My biggest issue with this debate is the level of shifting that goes on. All these peopleat efficiency yet I recall Team Kobe being the main ones going on and on about AI's FG% back in the day when AI was outscoring Kobe and winning scoring titles but shooting 40% and below. I remember people saying it was unfair to hold Shaq against Kobe (even though Kobe dikksucking started that whole issue) but now they wanna hold up Fred Sanford Wade and Chris "Spot up 3 pt shooter avg. less rebounds than Lebron" Bosh against Lebron.
When Bron doesn't lead his team in damn near every statistical category throughout the entire playoffs then maybe we can have that discussion about teammates. People go on and on about Bron's size advantage. He's what...2, 3 inches taller and 40-60 lbs heavier. Kobe is 6 inches taller and 40-60 lbs heavier than AI. AI avg. more points and assists for his career as well. Only area Kobe has him in is FG% and Reb but those don't count since Kobe is bigger right?
Size matters in this game and the reality is many of the greats wouldn't be as great if they weren't the size that they were, including Kobe.
*looks forward to misinterpretation, baseless insults, digression, semantic bs or this just being ignored altogether rather than an actual thoughtful reasoned response*
Here ya go on your BS again

You throw out blind stats about:
FTBS said:AI avg. more points and assists for his career as well
But yet, you tell me earlier in this thread that basketball is to be taken into context

I wonder why a guy who averaged 21 shots per game over his career averaged more points per game than a guy who took 2 less shots per game over his?

against SA last year? Yes. Did Kobe look any better against PHX, DET, BOS? (his squad was heavily favored against DET and favored against BOS like that matters but still people like to bring it up when it suit there agenda and they were up 3-1 against PHX)
at efficiency yet I recall Team Kobe being the main ones going on and on about AI's FG% back in the day when AI was outscoring Kobe and winning scoring titles but shooting 40% and below. I remember people saying it was unfair to hold Shaq against Kobe (even though Kobe dikksucking started that whole issue) but now they wanna hold up Fred Sanford Wade and Chris "Spot up 3 pt shooter avg. less rebounds than Lebron" Bosh against Lebron.
When Bron doesn't lead his team in damn near every statistical category throughout the entire playoffs then maybe we can have that discussion about teammates. People go on and on about Bron's size advantage. He's what...2, 3 inches taller and 40-60 lbs heavier. Kobe is 6 inches taller and 40-60 lbs heavier than AI. AI avg. more points and assists for his career as well. Only area Kobe has him in is FG% and Reb but those don't count since Kobe is bigger right?
Size matters in this game and the reality is many of the greats wouldn't be as great if they weren't the size that they were, including Kobe. 






