kobe never had an era.
Most NBA players disagree with you. Not sure how you think your opinion is more important.
kobe never had an era.
Most NBA players disagree with you. Not sure how you think your opinion is more important.
Who's era are we in now cause the players felt that Harden was the MVP last season and not Curry.This is the point I was coming to make
Lebron was the best player in the league dating back to at least 2007 imo
LeBron >>>>> Peyton. Peyton could never take over and dominate a playoff game like LeBron has on numerous occasions.
yup
and it doesnt even matter if lebron stayed in miami, bosh might be done in the nba and wade is just an above average nba player at this point
some of these tandems were hurt or not even on the same team in 2009 and 2010 and some are just laughable. The question was which front line would you trade LA's front line for. Naming store brand versions that Pau and Odom regularly feasted on is just
You had a problem with me saying the Lakers had the best front line in the game and falsely accused me of calling Odom dominant. Just list the front lines that were better, its not complicated. What you'll find is talent was really spread out then. The Lakers and Celtics made everyone else try to stack their teams.
Who ever thought that is obviously wrongWho's era are we in now cause the players felt that Harden was the MVP last season and not Curry.

We were only talking about the 2009 and 2010 seasons when the Lakers won. KG was hurt and started looking a little flabby those years.Not that I necessarily disagree with you but you wouldn't take '08-'12 KG and Perkins over Pau and Odom?
But you still refuse to answer the question because you know all of those guys were a step down. Should I just say the Lakers would have won in 09 if they had Brandon Roy instead of Kobe? Or talk about all of the other SGs that could have been paired up with Shaq in the early 2000's? It's the same shyt. It's not provable and you can say whatever you want. You're proving that the claims dont even have to be plausible.WHICH TANDEMS WERE NOT TOGETHER? I ONLY SEE ONE I EFFED UP ON.. REPLACE THAT WIT TYSON CHANDLER+DAVID WEST. LIKE I SAID, ANY OF THOSE COULD BE ARGUED AS BETTER.. PAU+ODOM WERE MADE TO LOOK BETTER.. U KNOW WHY? YOU GUESSED IT! BECAUSE THEY FUCCIN PLAYED WIT KOBE. SIMPLE SCIENCE.

But you still refuse to answer the question because you know all of those guys were a step down. Should I just say the Lakers would have won in 09 if they had Brandon Roy instead of Kobe? Or talk about all of the other SGs that could have been paired up with Shaq in the early 2000's? It's the same shyt. It's not provable and you can say whatever you want. You're proving that the claims dont even have to be plausible.
You're seriously sitting here and trying to tell me Kobe, Boozer, and Okur are winning championships together![]()
BOOZER IN HIS PRIME WAS EASILY COMPARABLE TO PAU, EVEN A BETTER SCORER AND REBOUNDER ACTUALLY.. OKUR WAS AN ALLSTAR, SOMETHIN ODOM NEVER WAS. PRIME KOBE WOULDA HAD THOSE GUYS LOOKIN INCREDIBLE WHILE WINNIN RINGS, THERES NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. N UD BE SITTING HERE N TALKIN BOUT WHAT AN INCREDIBLE FRONTLINE KOBE HAD..BUT KEEP ATTRIBUTING THOSE VICTORIES TO FUCCIN PAU GASOL AND LAMAR ODOM THINKIN U DONT SOUND SILLY
And these clowns call themselves lakers fansBoozer was never as good as pau. Stop talking basketball please.
. I've seen them try to discredit Phil and Shaq tooWho ever thought that is obviously wrong![]()
