So let me get this straight. Michael Jordan beats the 07 Spurs with a lineup of
Booby Gibson
Larry Hughes
Drew Gooden
Zydrunas Ilgauskas
And so what if Wiggins is a “euro” so is Jamal Murray...that nikka brings it. Steve Nash was a “euro” he brought the heat.
Doesn’t matter where you’re from it’s either you have it or not. Maybe you’re thinking MJ could have “pippened” Wiggins. But we don’t know that as fact.
Either way you’re wrong about Bron not fulfilling his potential of being “undefeated in the championship rounds” because his squad was severely undermaned.
Pick a player out of the all time top 5. Anyone...not one of them is beating a team as good as the 2007 Spurs with that Cavs starting lineup.
Again those players on paper have a higher pedigree than the bulls players in general.
Not to mention, lebron created why he lost because he would not play his natural.
So again, aLL your excuse making for lebron falls on deaf ears.
Simply because in general principal based on sound bball IQ.
Every night lebron shirked his natural he gave up a nightly mismatch. So miss me with your dumb bullshyt excuse making for this selfishly wack ass nikka, lebron.
As you are a fool to think the most pedigreed backcourt in NBA history is being beaten in general in a final round.
Plus, you are also admitting the fact lebron can not galvanize a grassroots group of players, when the drawing opponent is readily staffed to dispatch lebron. Which is totally different from mj.
Mj galvanized and ramped up jud buechler and bill wennington to compare and show you how wrong you are.
Any pedigreed coach would generally beat a team that on purpose shirks their nightly mismatch.
Simple as that.
You can deflect and talk abunch of bullshyt.
Plus Wiggins is a higher pedigreed and better player than Murray and Wiggins has ferocity and assertive issues. Which is from being a complete euro ostracized from whom his dad is. While Murray is the second Gen talent who did not have to flirt below the radar in development because of whom and what act his parents did.
Outside of that Murray is not on Wiggins level and if he was, he would be touted like Wiggins. yet he is not and is also a second Gen star and also did not have to be behind the radar because of whom or what his father may have or not done.
As far as pedigree and the finals.
I know the pedigree and IQ required to beat real pedigreed coaching and it is obvious lebron does not. Any fully pedigreed properly staffed coach can beat and has beat lebron shirk'n his natural.
Nobody would beat lebron if he actually studied film of magic.
Plus, bron actually had not of stunted his growth and shirked his natural.
Now you can make excuses but that is a fact.
as you completely skimmed and don't know the makeup of the finals from a pedigree standpoint. As mj beat every team on paper who was better than the bulls.
So mike would in that general idea beat the spurs regardless of lineup, too.
As the spurs not shyt to no trailblazers, or magic's hobbled Lakers.
If the spurs was the shyt,....they would have won before a shortened strike year, when mike was playing.
Plus would have a full season rubrick to use to win a title. Which is why pop teams always sneakily win a title.
as pops jags a portion of the year.
to get the spurs back within the same sample arena of games.
that the spurs won the title in a shortened season.
That is why the spurs whole thing about rest is subterfuge.
As the whole rest thing is just deflection to hide the fact.
the championship sweet spot for the spurs is based on the rubrick of a shortened season.
So again miss me with the bullshyt. The spurs would not even be there if not for a shortened season. Plus, Duncan was never more ferocious than the admiral and even in that. The spurs were never there.
when mike was there to even honor them as a threat to mike in a final round as well.
Art Barr
Trade away multiple attempts at getting a three peat, breh.