If I can't compare today's talent to what was cream of the crop yesteryear than why are we even having this discussion?
You're quick to say the other eras of basketball weren't that talented but want me to wait and see how today's stars end up like we don't already have a book on most of the players listed on that 2015 all star list? Since when did comparisons to the past wait?
Of course people are going to talk about it, because they love talking about it. It doesn't mean that most of what they say isn't still stupid.
Talent in a sport gets worse when the sport becomes less popular and fewer people are playing it. Otherwise, it tends to get better. Use simple logic.
Factors that make 2010s talent better than 1980s talent.
1) Basketball was way bigger among 1990s and 2000s youth than among 1960s and 1970s youth. WAY more kids are playing, they're playing young, they're trying harder at a younger age. Serious traveling teams with actual coaching are forming at younger and younger ages. Skills development is beginning earlier. There are 15x as many kids playing serious basketball as there used to be and the average 18-year-old bball prospect has 5x as much playing experience and coaching as he did in the 1980s. If you make the pool of talented people that much larger and give them that much more practice, how do they not end up better players?
2) There's a huge surge of international talent. There are over 100 international ballers from 35+ countries in the NBA
right now. That's talent that just wasn't available in the 1980s. San Antonio and Dallas's championship teams were built around international talent. In the Finals this year, you had Mosgov, Kyrie, Delly, Thompson, Bogut all starting (and Barbosa, Ezeli, Varejao on the bench). Again, how can you make the talent pool that much bigger and not get a more talented league?
3) Second-generation talent is coming through the league now. Former ballers' sons like Kobe, Steph Curry, and Klay Thompson have been living the game since they were little kids and are incredible. In the 1980s guys were just starting to make up their own moves - in the 2010s, they've been pulling off those moves since they were 8 AND making up their own new ones on top of it. How do you not improve upon what came before you? Do you seriously think that Jesse Owens had better running form and stronger legs than Usain Bolt?
4) Coaching has evolved. Defenses are far better, strategy is far more serious, rather than slacking most of the season its become a war 48 minutes of every game. Teams are playing zones, complex switching schemes, complex offenses with multiple things going on at once all over the court. As defenses have gotten better, offensive skills have gotten better and better to adjust.
Now, factors that make 1980s talent better than 2010s talent.
1) Nostalgia.
2) Magic "best era" fairy dust.
Do you honestly have a logical argument for why 1980s talent would be better that doesn't sound like some old-timer, "Man, in my day men were tougher! We had to work harder for everything! We were real men back then!"
Right, in the fukking 80s.
Because the obvious has already been stated: this is LeBron trying to save face for not being to get anything done in this era despite being supposedly the best player in the game.
Nothing other than five straight Finals and back-to-back championships by the age of 30. He's still got years ahead of him too. This random "didn't do anything" diss shyt makes no sense - no superstar has ever taken more shyt for "only" winning back-to-back championships at this age.