I don't think it's an intangible thing at all. People who can score the most ways in a relatively efficient manner = the best scorers in the league
Durant, Melo, Pierce, Dirk, Kobe = the best scorers in the NBA
Lebron will be in that conversation if he continues to work on his post and mid range skills. It's not about who has the most points, the best field goal percentage or who's the best overall player. A pure scorer = someone whose scoring ability has no weaknesses, no holes. No matter where they are on the floor they can hurt you. Point, blank period.
It shouldn't be a backhanded compliment, but it's used that way often. People have been using it as a backhanded compliment towards Carmelo Anthony for almost a decade now.
But if Bron is more efficient than all of them and scores around the same number of points per game despite the holes in his game, what good is being a "pure scorer"? Hence me asking if the term is overrated.
The insecure Kobe stans will catch feelings because I said Bron's name, so we'll use a different example.
Monta Ellis is a guy that gets that "pure scorer" label, as well. Yet, thus far this season, Tony Parker is averaging more points at a much more efficient rate than him. Yet one guy gets that "pure scorer" label while I've never heard that used to describe Tony Parker. Is it because Tony Parker's game is more well rounded to where people don't have to just make up a term to compliment what he brings to the table?

I think the term is worded incorrectly to be honest because if you have such a vast repertoire, then it should translate into easier scoring opportunities and allow you to do it efficiently.
I think the term is worded incorrectly to be honest because if you have such a vast repertoire, then it should translate into easier scoring opportunities and allow you to do it efficiently.
That's what I'm saying. If these "pure scorers" can score easily from anywhere on the floor and have the most advanced offensive skill set, how come their FG% is in the mid 40's? Melo can score from 3, his midrange game is nasty, he's strong as hell and can back you down, yet Tony Parker and broke jumper ass D. Wade have a higher shooting percentage? Why isn't that skill set translating into more easily acquired baskets, and in turn, boosting his FG%? I don't really get it, to be honest. shyt defies common logic.
That's what I'm saying. If these "pure scorers" can score easily from anywhere on the floor and have the most advanced offensive skill set, how come their FG% is in the mid 40's? Melo can score from 3, his midrange game is nasty, he's strong as hell and can back you down, yet Tony Parker and broke jumper ass D. Wade have a higher shooting percentage? Why isn't that skill set translating into more easily acquired baskets, and in turn, boosting his FG%? I don't really get it, to be honest. shyt defies common logic.
Versa said:This is why Kevin Durant is truly special. An efficient, skilled and versatile scorer. We are witnessing all time greatness on a nightly basis. The things this dude can do if he stays healthy is flat out disturbing.
It comes down to bbIQ. Melo as talented as he is takes some horrific shots. Guys like D-Wade and Parker know their jumper isn't the greatest so they attack the basket where they wreak havoc. Hell even Lebron knows (mind you his jumper has improved) will attack the basket where he is most efficient.
Durant is definitely a gifted offensive player. With his usage, this guy is shooting 90% FT, 50% from the field and 40% from 3. Sure he doesn't have a post game but he maximizes all the other spots on the floor.


Pure scorer is another way to praise inefficient scorers for having a "large arsenal "