Le'veon Bell: "I didnt know you could get a DUI from getting high" :laff:

[Dat916nigga]

lol at le'veon sounding like dave chappelle's white friend Chip from Killing Them Softly

"i'm sorry officer. i didn't know i couldn't do that"

 

[Absolut]

dwi doesnt refer specifically to alcohol. dui and dwi are the same exact shyt. a dwi can be "driving while impaired" its not just booze

 

[Spaceman Piff]

it doesnt matter if hes driving impaired?

2 hours is a long time ago


driving high is just being in the right lane worrying that you're speeding while going 15 under the speed limit

 

[Absolut]

youll get pulled over going 15 under the speed limit also

 

[heisenburrr]

it doesnt matter if hes driving impaired?

you ever drove while being high?

 

[Absolut]

no i dont smoke. and people shouldnt be driving while high

 

[Steezy]

currently at the dmv

 

[Dwight Howard]

it doesnt matter if hes driving impaired?

driving high on weed is NOTHING like driving drunk. not even comparable, especially for people who have smoked more than a few times.

 

[Absolut]

who gives a fukk about your tolerance to weed. what about people who drink every day, a .15 aint shyt to them either. you shouldn't be driving impaired period

 

[Spaceman Piff]

who gives a fukk about your tolerance to weed. what about people who drink every day, a .15 aint shyt to them either. you shouldn't be driving impaired period

the 2 are drastically different.


but that's why i do both before i drive.. to even myself out.

 

[Dwight Howard]

who gives a fukk about your tolerance to weed. what about people who drink every day, a .15 aint shyt to them either. you shouldn't be driving impaired period

breh. its not the same. I dont know why you are arguing this point eventhough you have never smoked. you have zero credibility on this subject. educate your self:

Although cannabis intoxication has been shown to mildly impair psychomotor skills, this impairment does not appear to be severe or long lasting. In driving simulator tests, this impairment is typically manifested by subjects decreasing their driving speed and requiring greater time to respond to emergency situations.

Nevertheless, this impairment does not appear to play a significant role in on-road traffic accidents. A 2002 review of seven separate studies involving 7,934 drivers reported, “Crash culpability studies have failed to demonstrate that drivers with cannabinoids in the blood are significantly more likely than drug-free drivers to be culpable in road crashes.” This result is likely because subject under the influence of marijuana are aware of their impairment and compensate for it accordingly, such as by slowing down and by focusing their attention when they know a response will be required. This reaction is just the opposite of that exhibited by drivers under the influence of alcohol, who tend to drive in a more risky manner proportional to their intoxication.

“Cannabis leads to a more cautious style of driving, [but] it has a negative impact on decision time and trajectory. [However,] this in itself does not mean that drivers under the influence of cannabis represent a traffic safety risk. … Cannabis alone, particularly in low doses, has little effect on the skills involved in automobile driving.”

http://norml.org/library/item/marijuana-and-driving-a-review-of-the-scientific-evidence

stop comparing the two

 

[Absolut]

where did i compare the 2? second, you SHOULD NOT be driving imparied. says right in the first line in the article it impairs motor skills. you are in here excusing dumbasses for driving under the influence. fukk outta here

 

[heisenburrr]

where did i compare the 2? second, you SHOULD NOT be driving imparied. says right in the first line in the article it impairs motor skills. you are in here excusing dumbasses for driving under the influence. fukk outta here

Man you sound lame as fukk.

Driving high is the equivalent of driving with less than the legal alcool limit in your blood.

People like you that have never experienced something first hand and just accept the authority's decisions on whether you should do it or not are the dumbasses

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

no i dont smoke. and people shouldnt be driving while high

If you don't smoke it's safe to say you don't know what you're talking about.

Because that's ALL I'm getting from your posts.

 

[Spaceman Piff]

where did i compare the 2? second, you SHOULD NOT be driving imparied. says right in the first line in the article it impairs motor skills. you are in here excusing dumbasses for driving under the influence. fukk outta here

you ever drive sleepy breh?