The US supreme court’s assault on voting rights hits a new lowBlacks have had voting rights since 1867 they gonna repeal that too and take us back into slavery? lol. Nah. Not happening. Scare tactics won't work. HYON
In an unexpected move, the court decided to throw out new districts for the state legislature in Wisconsin that had been picked by the state supreme court. But what was even more surprising was that the court’s conservative majority seemed to go out of its way to attack the Voting Rights Act, one of the most important civil rights laws designed to prevent discrimination in US elections. “Extra headspinning,” was how Michael Li, a redistricting expert at the Brennan Center for Justice, described it. “Bizarre,” observed Richard Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California, Irvine. David Wasserman, a redistricting expert at the non-partisan Cook Political Report, tweeted that the supreme court had entered “uncharted territory”.
The court’s decision in the Wisconsin case was the latest in a series of rulings that have left little pretense of how aggressively it is trying to weaken section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), the most powerful provision of the law, which outlaws racially discriminatory voting practices. The court is not hiding its skepticism of the use of race in redistricting, even when it’s used to protect minority voters, and is making it harder for litigants to justify considering race when district lines are redrawn.
The court has recently used a docket of emergency cases – called the shadow docket – to issue consequential voting rights rulings for two other cases with little reasoning or briefing – sometimes both. Last month, the court blocked a lower court’s ruling that would have required Alabama to implement an additional Black-majority congressional district. In another shadow docket ruling this month, three of the court’s justices embraced a fringe legal theorythat courts cannot second-guess state legislatures on election matters.
That timing raised eyebrows because of a decision written by Justices Kavanaugh and Alito in the Alabama case. Writing in early February, the two conservative justices said it was too close to Alabama’s 24 May election to justify imposing new maps. But in a different redistricting case in North Carolina in early March, Alito wrote a ruling, joined by Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, saying it was not too close to North Carolina’s 17 March primary to overturn maps that were being challenged there.
It’s amazing.
I read history. I read about how the Nazi’s slowly got a bunch of groups of the paint… then finally came for Jewish people as a whole. And everyone knows how that turned out..
Yet, I look around the rooms that I’m in and everyone is “well that ain’t my problem.. oh well”
and I’m so confused. Then, it hits me. That history will simply always repeat itself, because people are stupid.
It’s all fun and games when they attack women and LGBT but they’re coming for civil rights and affirmative action too. Nothing to joke about here.
![]()
Fake liberal scare tacticIt’s all fun and games when they attack women and LGBT but they’re coming for civil rights and affirmative action too. Nothing to joke about here.
![]()
Not a problem. Then let’s fight for and secure our rights specifically. Form a black ACLU.
That doesn’t include LGBT, Asians, immigrants etc. They can all HYON. Pretty simple actually
If they'll be fine they don't need black people's help then right?????![]()
nikka are you aware there are gay black people![]()
"Not a problem...Pretty simple actually"
Yall black conservatives got to be the dumbest nikkas on Earth.
Can someone explain this simple minded TLR logic that having empathy for the rights of others means you're somehow abandoning black causes?
Can someone explain to me why only on TLR is being passively supportive of a fascist takeover of peoples civil rights somehow a show of support for black people?
So I should keep my head in the sand about what the courts are doing to civil rights laws so that I don't come off as "scared" or "rescuing" others?
Yall some sociopaths.