Yeah, that was some pathetic stupid shyt. Added that to Kobe's list but not Lebron's, just so Kobe's list looks longer?
2. He also wrote out the years differently on the two lists so Kobe's list looks bigger.
3. Most of the teams Kobe beat were when Shaq was the leader, not Kobe
4. Kobe's had much better teams than Lebron, especially coaching
5. Lebron's hasn't even finished his 12th season, Kobe has 19
6. 50 is a completely artificial number. Kobe's beaten a lot of teams that just barely got 50 wins - if the cutoff was "51" instead, Kobe's list would be 5-6 shorter
7. Why is beating a 50-win team even impressive? Why not, say, 55-win team? Since 2004 when Shaq left, Kobe's only beaten two 55-win teams, while Lebron has beaten five.
8. Lebron's most dominant year was a lockout year, so teams only played 66 games. If they had played a full schedule, both Indiana and OKC would have been 50-win teams that year (possibly Boston too because they got hot late), so that's more teams that should be on Lebron's list.
9. Lebron's already beaten another 60-win team (Atlanta) since this list was made. And is facing another one right now.
10. Magic didn't beat many 50-win teams in his career either, but Laker fans literally never bring that up.
Add in the lockout year and the teams Lebron just beat, and Kobe/Lebrons post-2004 lists are basically the same. And that's with Kobe beating a bunch of barely-50 teams - make the list "55-win teams" instead, and Lebron beats post-Shaq Kobe 5 to 2 in the same time frame.
You're not counting the lockout year. That doesn't change that this year is fukking impressive too.