LIVE! - Bible vs. Science: Big Online 'Origins of the Universe' Debate TONIGHT (2/4/14)

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
45,062
Reputation
8,170
Daps
122,369
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Napoleon said:
thats not spontaneous.

if you understand how energetic confirmations of molecules work, its not really that "random" at all.

Look at the Miller Urey experiments. It basically proves it.

Those experiments didn't prove abiogenesis. Matter of fact, Creationists use them to disprove evolution.
 
Joined
Oct 9, 2013
Messages
1,202
Reputation
-780
Daps
1,414
thats not spontaneous.

if you understand how energetic confirmations of molecules work, its not really that "random" at all.

Look at the Miller Urey experiments. It basically proves it.

Wow! :wow: I can't believe you used the Miller Urey experiments as an example of spontaneous generation.
They DIDN'T even come close to creating life with that experiment. :russ:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
329,133
Reputation
-34,085
Daps
635,331
Reppin
The Deep State
Wow! :wow: I can't believe you used the Miller Urey experiments as an example of spontaneous generation.
They DIDN'T even come close to creating life with that experiment. :russ:
1. Craig venter has done it with the substates a few years ago
2. The point of the miller urey experiments was show how amino acids formed
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
329,133
Reputation
-34,085
Daps
635,331
Reppin
The Deep State
Those experiments didn't prove abiogenesis. Matter of fact, Creationists use them to disprove evolution.

Yeah...they did in my eyes.

See, we've only been doing this shyt for about 60 years...and in that time, we've basically established not only a clear genetic and physiologic link between and among all living things, we have managed to artificially create the environments in which energetic confirmations can take place and give rise to common biological substrates.

Give us another 100 years and we'll be even closer.

The direction is CLEAR as day.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
329,133
Reputation
-34,085
Daps
635,331
Reppin
The Deep State
Not in mine.​

I don't know what you'd be asking for.

ALSO there are other experiments SINCE then that have also replicated and expanded the Miller-Urey trials since then. Look into them.

Its pretty much settled IMO.

The ONLY problem with it is of course...we weren't there. But thats not really a flaw in the research or something we may ever be able to confirm.

As far as we know, there could have been SEVERAL isntances of this happening more than once on the planet but it took only the successful one to make it.

Once you understand that its ALL chemistry, the rest falls into place.
 
Top