Yes simplify the argument to simply reinforcing the validity of science. As I said, and as you keep omitting, creationism believes in science too. However, where creationism differs, is that it tries to define science through 2 areas of focus: historical vs observational.
Your statement that bill nye is reinforcing the validity of science, does nothing to articulate his much more advanced argument against there being two aspects of science.
If you think the two are equal, it is you who is clearly the dumbass. Think of it as an AP test. You know, high school level of comprehension. There are 2 correct answers, but only 1 of them is right. You know, high school level of comprehension.