Look back on history takeover was better then ether - jay z

Still FloW

Gawd Of Shinobi
Joined
Dec 5, 2012
Messages
16,858
Reputation
4,725
Daps
58,093
Reppin
Inside K. Michelle's Box
UQVFIDo.jpg
 

MikeyC

The Coli Royal Rumble Champion 2019
Joined
Jan 4, 2015
Messages
25,802
Reputation
4,974
Daps
88,688
Reppin
London
Much better.

Ether was scything, but takeover was a cold, calculated, nuanced attack that made you look at Nas in a different light. :whoo:
 

Alexander Wiggin

All Star
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
3,888
Reputation
1,645
Daps
12,053
Reppin
Paris Saint-Germain
Much better.

Ether was scything, but takeover was a cold, calculated, nuanced attack that made you look at Nas in a different light. :whoo:

yeaaah, that's like saying the boxer number 1 was tactical, precise, throwing efficient punchs here and there, dancing on the ring, ducking like a fly but then he got BRUTAL KO'd by boxing number 2 who came out with missiles lauches

kinda remind me of




people always cracked me up thinking you can separate the diss from the song like takeover was the better song and ether the better diss. NO! a diss is a diss. And the better diss is ether, that's al that matter. You can't separate the purpose of the song, the concept of why it was done in the first place. the ether beat make s you thing of agression, puts you in a battle mood. takeover much less. so in a sense, the ether instrumental was a better choice. Even the way nas spit his verse is better, tha cadence in the first verse :banderas:

you can't rock a crowd like nas did in central park with a diss like takeover. it don't have that energy
 
Last edited:
Top