...you're missing the part where offensive capabilities are deemed legal.The US stated that offensive state sponsored cyber attacks are an act or war, internationally it is considered illegal. So yes what the US did to Iran, what its objective to do with its NSA and CIA in terms of hacking is illegal by definition.
Yeah it does. Same way treason laws exist. Idiot.The law doesn't change depending on the person, if it is the law, it is the law.
I'm arguing for a rule of law that prefers US interests above all others.Now if you are arguing for no rule of law just flat out state the US can do what it wants when it wants and it is not subject to its own domestic laws which restrict it or the international law the government signs on to enforce.
Except your understanding of nat-sec law is...piss poor.You hypocritically ignore the US government's own prohibitions to the actions that it openly takes.
I got you, should have just said the US government isn't bound by any law from the beginning, would have saved us some time.
Except you don't understand what the US is limited to.

