Louie Gohmert rallies blacks: You won your freedom so you can discriminate against gays

[Hiphoplives4eva]

lol...how does one even respond to balderash like this? Some of y'all really need to turn off Tariq Nasheed, Tommy Sotomayor, or whatever other clown ass uneducated youtube charlatans you let inform your worldview and do some serious research...which requires reading books. It takes up more time, it's harder to do, and it isn't as fun, but you'll be informed instead of brainwashed by self-gratifying

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

Sad watching you funboys fight so hard for these queens while your people rot because of racism. Like everything black people fight for, who does this help the most, whites so as always, they got you dummies fighting for white supremacy.

Gay rights is a way people that dont have the courage to fight racism can feel like they're making a difference in the world for meaningless legislation that doesnt benefit society, At ALL.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

 

[TLOL is back]

Yea, it's like when people compare criticism of Israel to antisemitism.

^ That's more analogous to birther:racist

 

[Mr. Somebody]

Please...Im not stupid, nikka. We're talking about black men who invest in the hatred of gays, and support the suppression of their rights. We're not talking about black men saying "aint got time for all that"...thats why I specifically mentioned that I have no issue with black people who are ambivalent on the subject. Dont try to con me, and disguise your malevolent attitudes towards another group with neutral pragmatism. Go take your white supremacist sympathy sht and get the fukk on

And please stop acting like a victim. Basic decency towards another is not some "Its not on all on our backs" burden...god, you nikkas really love stealing from the cac usa playbook.

O really, and how do black people that dont agree with homosexuality support and invest in the suppression of rights here in the states? With their thoughts? This isnt our issue.

You'll be cosigning incest in no time. Theres really no difference.

 

[philmonroe]

10 years ago Black people would have never been behaving like this, shyt will be completely out of control in 10 more years.

This is true and funny thing is even then I felt the same way about gays. I don't cosign what they do but I agree with their right to do it. These new age sheep nikkas might have been former homophobes (similar to Whitlock) who now they going to far the other way to show they reformed. That's how you know the media is powerful as fukk and will get weak minded people like a Jedi mind trick everytime.

 

[iceberg_is_on_fire]

I saw this and it made me think of this thread.

 

[DEAD7]

White liberals have some nikkaz thinking the biggest issue facing our community is Gay rights and immigration reform

 

[DEAD7]

Is the ethnic struggle's relationship to the behavior struggle, really two way(mutual)?

 

[tmonster]

Is the ethnic struggle's relationship to the behavior struggle, really two way(mutual)?

 

[tmonster]

White liberals have some nikkaz thinking the biggest issue facing our community is Gay rights and immigration reform

"divide and conquer" is not just a fancy saying

 

[rapbeats]

Pretty much....dont really see how a "real black man" could align with white supremacists, and deny the rights of others based on who they are and whom they choose to love.

Do these arguments sound familiar? Guess what he thinks about black people:

http://www.mediaite.com/online/limb...lt-by-the-2-to-5-percent-that-are-homosexual/
http://www.mediaite.com/online/limbaugh-az-governor-‘is-being-bullied-by-the-homosexual-lobby’/

so you trying to tell me that as a black man if a racist white supremacist believes the sky is blue. I cant agree that the sky is blue too?

i mean thats pretty much what you're saying.
i said this in that duck dynasty thread. there are times where even a wrong person is correct in certain situations. i'm not saying this AZ bill is right either. cause AZ always takes it to an extreme. But bets believe i'm a real black man yet i aint running up behind the gay movement. i have no issues with humans having rights and not being physically or verbally abused. but beyond that. lets keep it 150... you choose to act our your gay lifestyle. i was BORN black. there's a huge difference. you can choose to live a life where you dont have a romantic relationship with anyone. and no one will ever know you have you have romantic thoughts about someone of the same sex. you could easily keep that to yourself. i cant keep my black skin to myself. if i could. maybe i would..you know to get a better job, you know to not get tazed or killed by the cops. you know to not get as much jail time when they do catch me with something something. i mean imagine if a black person could choose to be black or not at different times.

what if i could COME OUT and say "hey everybody guess what? I"m Black" and receive all the accolades and awards. get a special invite to the presidents address, get put in magazines, throw my name around with jackie robinson, etc. that would be nice.

 

[rapbeats]

Why should an American citizen be against the autonomy of another non-violent adult citizen?

If a homosexual couple wants to get married at St Johns Baptist Church off of 43rd (pick a hood). and the pastor says NO. should said couple be able to sue the church? and state "the church gets a special tax exempt status. therefore they have to abide by federal/state law."

Answer the question.

If your answer is yes. then the part of what these AZ nuts are talking about is an issue. where you are more or less using gay rights to trump the people's right to believe in whatever religion they choose(also non violent).


The same scenario can be applied to me owning a christian book store. do i have to hire someone who is OPENLY GAY? and if i choose not to, is it ok for me to be sued by said Gay person?

i'm not asking you what you would want. for all i know you want "religion to die." my question is what is correct per our constitutional rights.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

If a homosexual couple wants to get married at St Johns Baptist Church off of 43rd (pick a hood). and the pastor says NO. should said couple be able to sue the church? and state "the church gets a special tax exempt status. therefore they have to abide by federal/state law."

Answer the question.

Churches operate under different rules, unfortunately. Marriage is a GOVERNMENT status, not a religious one.

So no. The couple should not be allowed to get married in the church. They can do what they want.

You're married when you sign the paperwork, not when you do some magic shyt in a chapel

If your answer is yes. then the part of what these AZ nuts are talking about is an issue. where you are more or less using gay rights to trump the people's right to believe in whatever religion they choose(also non violent).

Businesses can ALREADY deny service to people for any host of reasons. Why specifically target gays?

The same scenario can be applied to me owning a christian book store. do i have to hire someone who is OPENLY GAY? and if i choose not to, is it ok for me to be sued by said Gay person?

You technically don't have to.

You can't say you didn't hire them because they were gay. You can just say you didn't hire them for reason XYZ, etc. Just like they do for any other job.

i'm not asking you what you would want. for all i know you want "religion to die." my question is what is correct per our constitutional rights.

Your rights aren't being infringed on.

Its funny that Arizona must think all gays are super flamboyant divas. Theres probably super masculine dudes walking into those businesses who'd never get second guessed as being gay.

 

[rapbeats]

Churches operate under different rules, unfortunately. Marriage is a GOVERNMENT status, not a religious one.

So no. The couple should not be allowed to get married in the church. They can do what they want.

You're married when you sign the paperwork, not when you do some magic shyt in a chapel



Businesses can ALREADY deny service to people for any host of reasons. Why specifically target gays?

You technically don't have to.

You can't say you didn't hire them because they were gay. You can just say you didn't hire them for reason XYZ, etc. Just like they do for any other job.


Your rights aren't being infringed on.

Its funny that Arizona must think all gays are super flamboyant divas. Theres probably super masculine dudes walking into those businesses who'd never get second guessed as being gay.

you skated around the last question. why cant a christian bookstore owner have in his qualifications "has to believe in the christian bible and follow biblical principles.. ie no openly gay applicants will be hired, no cheaters that state they are cheating on their spouses will be hired, not thieves that state they are thieves will be hired, etc, etc."

So that means if they can keep their business to themselves and off the internet(facebook, instagram, etc) all public social media. then sure you can be hired.