no back to backs, y'all the Spurs
by this logic the heat were a dynasty and the spurs weren't

no back to backs, y'all the Spurs


Barry Bonds has not retiredCongrats Giants
It's kinda sad that they're winning all these ships shortly after arguably the goat Giant retired...
but then again, some folks (cacs) would say that's justice.

by this logic the heat were a dynasty and the spurs weren't
![]()

Giants are the team right now but no one is calling yall a Dynasty. That's the true sign of domination. Every dominant team did that.Giants are the team right now but no one is calling yall a Dynasty. That's the true sign of domination. Every dominant team did that.
yea nobody is calling them a dynasty just coli posters
Time
http://time.com/3547449/san-francisco-giants-world-series-madison-bumgarner/
New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/29/s...nts-have-the-trappings-of-a-dynasty.html?_r=0
Forbes
http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthew...ries-leaves-with-more-questions-than-answers/
Foxsports
http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/story/...third-world-series-title-in-five-years-102914
USAToday
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sport...series-game-7-royals-giants-dynasty/18153359/
Bloomberg
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-10-30/giants-win-series-and-dynasty-status
etc etc

Rofl at the poll results change
Last week dudes had the royals 36 and Frisco 28..

Bay Area brehs, will the PAWGS be out for the parade?![]()


if this team was in ny it would be considered a dynastyThat's all well and good but when we talk dynasty I'm looking at the Yankees, 49ers, Lakers Cowboys.
If the NY Giants won the Superbowl this year are they a dynasty? The only thing I love about this Giants team is y'all have never lost a playoff series.![]()
if this team was in ny it would be considered a dynasty
I doubt that breh. That team would get more pub but thats about it.
This isn't a shot at the SF Giants but I would say this for any team. Spurs aren't a dynasty imo.