Malik Obama endorses Trump

[Tony D'Amato]

Nikka i wish i coud beat the sambo out of you...Look at you tap-dancing for this she devil who is responsible for so many nikkas meeting an untimely end in American prisons and Africa.
What kind of pussified male are you where you will pick Hillary cos you scared of trump...does she remind you of the abusive mother you were a little too close to as a child...the one who obviously taught you all about dycks

See, u clueless. U think I like Hillary Clinton its not about liking her. Its about believing she will be pushed to the left. For me everything is about the supreme Court. Everything. There is nothing more important than the next potus filling that opening, and RBG. I saw who Trump would appoint, I w/ HRC

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

See, u clueless. U think I like Hillary Clinton its not about liking her. Its about believing she will be pushed to the left. For me everything is about the supreme Court. Everything. There is nothing more important than the next potus filling that opening, and RBG. I saw who Trump would appoint, I w/ HRC

That scotus Bullshyt is just there to scare you..the idea that the judges MUST vote according their bias is ridiculous..Second they must be vetted so trump wont be able to get anyone crazy past congress..
Third the court has never stripped an entire group of people of a protected right. The chances of a complete do-over of the court’s prior decision even with Trumps hand picked judges is non existent.

On the other hand this woman will take us into another 2 or three useless wars that nobody has the money to pay for ...really make us broke..and by the time she is done the jihadists will have more franchises worldwide than mcdonalds...theyll be serving us every day.

 

[GOATpernick]

In a vacuum this is actually a great photo

 

[hashmander]

That scotus Bullshyt is just there to scare you..the idea that the judges MUST vote according their bias is ridiculous..Second they must be vetted so trump wont be able to get anyone crazy past congress..
Third the court has never stripped an entire group of people of a protected right. The chances of a complete do-over of the court’s prior decision even with Trumps hand picked judges is non existent.

On the other hand this woman will take us into another 2 or three useless wars that nobody has the money to pay for ...really make us broke..and by the time she is done the jihadists will have more franchises worldwide than mcdonalds...theyll be serving us every day.

a republican who knows the supreme court is the most important branch of our govt during these hyper partisan times is trying to convince us that the supreme court isn't really that important so don't let that determine how you vote.

please let it determine how you vote brehs. if you want more justices like c00n thomas, vote for trump. more like RBG and sotomayor (and not the moist c00n one) then vote for shillary.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

a republican who knows the supreme court is the most important branch of our govt during these hyper partisan times is trying to convince us that the supreme court isn't really that important so don't let that determine how you vote.

please let it determine how you vote brehs. if you want more justices like c00n thomas, vote for trump. more like RBG and sotomayor (and not the moist c00n one) then vote for shillary.

You could easily prove me wrong and ill vote for her too...give me ONE example of a SC ruling that completely reversed a previous ruling that established a protected constitutional right??


Just one??..cmon....prove your fears are actually based on something ??


ill wait

 

[hashmander]

You could easily prove me wrong and ill vote for her too...give me ONE example of a SC ruling that completely reversed a previous ruling that established a protected constitutional right??


Just one??..cmon....prove your fears are actually based on something ??


ill wait

has nothing to do with my post because my post didn't have anything to do with your protected right paragraph. simply pointing out that the supreme court is more important that you're downplaying as if people should only be concerned that their right to vote won't be taken away or you won't be made a slave again or some bullshyt. they decide important issues other than protected rights. a more liberal supreme court and poor folks in the south (not destitute) would have expanded medicare right now. that's life and death to some people.

 

[ⒶⓁⒾⒶⓈ]

has nothing to do with my post because my post didn't have anything to do with your protected right paragraph. simply pointing out that the supreme court is more important that you're downplaying as if people should only be concerned that their right to vote won't be taken away or you won't be made a slave again or some bullshyt. they decide important issues other than protected rights. a more liberal supreme court and poor folks in the south (not destitute) would have expanded medicare right now. that's life and death to some people.

Its life and death for the servicemen and syrians who will die in Hillarys war too

 

[hashmander]

Its life and death for the servicemen and syrians who will die in Hillarys war too

drumpf is talking about boots on the ground in syria and i'm suppose to put that on equal footing with the supreme court? with both candidates there is potential for boots on the ground. seems like the military loves neocons anyway. i know there is a difference between their potential supreme court justices though. less servicemen have died under obama than did under dubya, but if it was just the military that got to elect our president bush would probably win.

 

[Poh SIti Dawn]

the last photo of malik and ghadafi lmao.

Like that was just to throw something in there for troll shock value.