Man Acquitted Of Murdering Drunk Driver That Killed His Kids

[jadillac]

some of you guys need to man up.

Just b/c we've evolved as humans in society, it doesn't mean stuff like this is unacceptable.

I bet y'all believe these ppl who shoot up schools/theaters etc if captured, deserve to be "given a fair trial". Screw that, if a parent or parents of one of these dead kids pulled out a gun and shot him while the cops were arresting him, I'd be like



Y'all call it vigilante justice, I call fair(as close as fair can get for one who killed ur kid) .

But then again I'm from the South

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

http://abcnews.go.com/US/charges-texas-father-beat-death-daughters-molester/story?id=16612071

And




Natural reaction to put someone in the dirt for harming your child.

rape is a LOT different

 

[CJ]

I know its besides the point but the execution of that shooting was flawless

That precision was impeccable, especially with the other guy inches behind him

 

[MidwestD]

Good the father got off, the death of his kids is his imprisonment for the rest of his life

THIS, dude still doin a life sentence even though he's technically free

 

[Kritic]

THIS, dude still doin a life sentence even though he's technically free

it wrecks him too having to live with the fact that the other dudes kids too might not live with the loss of their father and would come after him.
if he is someone with a good conscience he has to think about the other kids too. even worse, if he gets to see them and talk to them.

 

[Fervid]

That precision was impeccable, especially with the other guy inches behind him

He's probably just lucky the bullet didn't pass through and hit the other guy.

 

[acri1]

So they guy deserved to run over 2 innocent children, kill them while beign irresponsible, then have a right to a trial where it's theoretically possible he could get off or find some loophole for a light sentence?

I bet if every DRUNK driver knew they might get blasted with a shotgun, I bet they'd stop, no?

You really don't seem to get the point.

On a personal level it's understandable but the government doesn't have any place condoning a murder. Murder is a crime regardless of what the reasons are. I might do the same thing if I was in dude's situation but that doesn't mean the court should let him off, and if I was in that situation I wouldn't expect to be let off either.

You can't excuse crimes because somebody has a sympathetic reason for committing them, that's a slippery slope you don't want to go down. Eventually you get to a point where half of murders are being thrown out because the murderer has an understandable motive.

 

[FUPA]

let the law take it into their hands and give him 10 years while you lost your kids forever brehs.



fukk that kill that nikka on sight.

 

[blackzeus]

If the driver was white and the shooter was black, what are the odds the same judgment would have happened?

 

[ADevilYouKhow]

support murder, brehs

some of you guys would be right at home in tribal Pakistan and Afghanistan

 

[MidwestD]

support murder, brehs

some of you guys would be right at home in tribal Pakistan and Afghanistan

that aint even CLOSE to a fair comparison, a drunk driving child killer shot to death, is a lot different than being stoned to death for adultery in Pak. and Afganistan.

 

[Kritic]

support murder, brehs

some of you guys would be right at home in tribal Pakistan and Afghanistan

negged. haha what the fok you talking about devil

 

[tmonster]

If I saw my kids limbs flying and shyt and some dude stumbles out of the car visibly impaired I don't think I would be able to call the police and hope they sort it out. Street Justice.

that's the thing...I think
1. That man has already paid a price we can't imagine,

2. I don't know if punishing him any further is a good thing for society given that the driver was drunk

3. If you told me he went insane and got a gun and hunted the man down for 3 years, much less over the course of a few seconds, I would believe you. I can tell you that I don't know if I could or not, but I almost hope that I could not contain myself in that situation.

As an adult living in our society, with wide access to cheap public, and relatively cheap private transportation, and all the preemptive admonishments about the dangers of drunk driving, it seems to me that anyone who gets drunk with no explicit plan to not drive is essentially committing reckless premeditated murder if they kill someone while driving; you might as well play Russian roulette with a gun aimed at a crowd.

 

[88m3]

that's the thing...I think
1. That man has already paid a price we can't imagine,

2. I don't know if punishing him any further is a good thing for society given that the driver was drunk

3. If you told me he went insane and got a gun and hunted the man down for 3 years, much less over the course of a few seconds, I would believe you. I can tell you that I don't know if I could or not, but I almost hope that I could not contain myself in that situation.

As an adult living in our society, with wide access to cheap public, and relatively cheap private transportation, and all the preemptive admonishments about the dangers of drunk driving, it seems to me that anyone who gets drunk with no explicit plan to not drive is essentially committing reckless premeditated murder if they kill someone while driving; you might as well play Russian roulette with a gun aimed at a crowd.

If I have a bad day at the office and the price I paid, "you can't imagine", in your eyes I'm justified in going postal.

 

[tmonster]

If I have a bad day at the office and the price I paid, "you can't imagine", in your eyes I'm justified in going postal.

Gosh....that's an interesting standard you have presented
if in your eyes, "a bad day at the office", fits a reasonable equivalence to having two of your children killed in front of you and going postal, decidedly a term used to describe, an act of untimely and indiscriminate rage and mass violence/murder, as also equivalent to killing the one man, you just watched kill your two children and stopping there, then by all means: feel free to "go postal" when you have "a bad day at the office", society will have to weigh your "reasoning" on the scales of justice:notbadsas:, just like they weighed the man in the OP story, your lawyers will have to make a case to a jury of your peers as to why "not being able to find your stapler, justified you gunning down all those people" good luck. You would have company, someone once went "postal" because his dog told him to, and they got judged too, so...