You need to read text and subtext. Reparations is one thing. But he’s willing to embrace conspiracy theories when facts don’t fit. He’s willing to entertain being used/embraced by the alt right when the message he communicates does not receive the support that he wants. And he’s willing to vilify black immigrants because there is a need for a black boogeyman in the ADOS/FBA reparations narrative. This is the battery pack that ADOS/FBA supporters need to put in the backs of those that are willing to push their agenda.
Text and subject???
1. Sir What alt right messages did he embrace? I'm talking about ideologies he endorsed that would turn into polices if he were to be elected?
2. How did he vilify black immigrants? He pointed how the govt has used immigration as a buffer class for black americans who are not immigrants. He never pointed out specifically BLACK IMMIGRANTS were a problem.
3. There is no "black boogyman" in the reparations arguments
It sounds like you are just projecting and have a problem with the reparations talk going to a specific group of people.. If that's the case then stand on it...