Martha Stewart throws shot at Clarence Thomas

[saturn7]

And he would still have to bear his own blame being a radicalized c00n.. doesn't matter how he got there.

But white folks, Lib, Conservative or in between don't get the right to call him racial slurs because they don't agree with his opinions. Black folks cheering this shyt are retarded.

Your same Liberal friends will be calling you a dumb naker and ungrateful as soon as you don't agree with them.

 

[Henry Orbit]

Clarence Thomas doesn't deserve any defending, but it is interesting that there's only passive smoke by these women to the only white woman justice who voted in favor of this compared to what he's getting

 

[ORDER_66]

NO one in here should be defending clarance thomas AT ALL...

cast him out!!!

 

[Frieza666]

A c00n & a racist cacette. fukk em both

 

[Stone Cold]

Martha got street cred to G check Clarence

Clarence parents had a real good marriage

 

[omnifax]

You can disagree or not like Clarence Thomas without calling him the n-word or asking for his ancestors to be lynched. Anyone who points that out isn't defending him they are calling out the racial showcasing going on.

Yes, I understand that he wrote an additional opinion (not the primary opinion or the leaked one mind you) on the case but I also understand that 5 justices agreed with him (on jackson, 4 on roe) and they agree with everything else he wrote in that opinion. That's the damn problem, it isn't one magic negro who is the source it's him and a bunch of other white folks teaming up do this is who aren't being targeted the way he is. For instance why don't we talk about the white woman AG from Mississippi who brought the case to the supreme court in the first place. How her family got money off inheriting a slave plantation yet thinks we don't need abortion because all women now have to means to be a single mother like she did. There are a myriad of accomplices to this event but all we get to see is Clarence Thomas? FOH

The internet really messes with folks ability to think objectively.

 

[Starburst]

Who's y'all? You worship Eminem on one side of this forum then come here and act like a Black militant. All you fools in here trying to carry that c00ns dead weight are lost. He doesn't need defending because that's you knee jerk reaction to white criticism. He is fukking up.

@ you even making a comparison, and not seeing the bigger picture.

 

[Starburst]

You can disagree or not like Clarence Thomas without calling him the n-word or asking for his ancestors to be lynched. Anyone who points that out isn't defending him they are calling out the racial showcasing going on.

Yes, I understand that he wrote an additional opinion (not the primary opinion or the leaked one mind you) on the case but I also understand that 5 justices agreed with him (on jackson, 4 on roe) and they agree with everything else he wrote in that opinion. That's the damn problem, it isn't one magic negro who is the source it's him and a bunch of other white folks teaming up do this is who aren't being targeted the way he is. For instance why don't we talk about the white woman AG from Mississippi who brought the case to the supreme court in the first place. How her family got money off inheriting a slave plantation yet thinks we don't need abortion because all women now have to means to be a single mother like she did. There are a myriad of accomplices to this event but all we get to see is Clarence Thomas? FOH

The internet really messes with folks ability to think objectively

 

[Mugenight]

All of this because you can't kill babies anymore.

Imagine letting an albino bytch get comfortable enough to talk out the side of her neck in this capacity.