Martha Stewart throws shot at Clarence Thomas

[RhodyRum]

Good fukk that c00n, if yall aint gonna reprimand our c00ns let white folks do it

I don't think anyone has a problem with Martha Stewart being critical of him. I sure as hell don't. My issue is why drag the man's skin color into it? She can call him any non-slur insulting name in the book as far as I'm concerned, but the "you're not behaving / thinking like a Black person the way I want" play is one play that has no place in her playbook. This broad basically called for an Iso outta the I formation while running the 1991 Houston Oilers playbook with her no TEs or FBs on the roster having ass

Spoiler

She'd have probably questioned Warren Moon's blackness after that Bills comeback in that '93 playoff game as well

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

It’s not about what he’s ok with or not. And no, just like Obama he’s still a Black man in a system of white supremacy so he doesn’t have more power than what I believe. This is about the left wing of white supremacy portraying a Black man as the symbolic scapegoat.

If you’re fine with defending him then go right ahead. Just remember all the caping and defending you’re doing on his behalf isn’t to change how he feels about it. He will still choose those white supremacist over you if it all came down to it because again he’s made it clear that’s how he roles.

If you don’t believe that, then look at who his wife is and what she’s done.

 

[Cat piss martini]

ass cancer is too good for that c00n

 

[TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?]

People have been defending him on this site all day in other threads breh. This isn’t the only about him that’s been posted today.

So what you're saying is, you're okay with cacs calling him a n*gger?

 

[lib123]

If you’re fine with defending him then go right ahead. Just remember all the caping and defending you’re doing on his behalf isn’t to change how he feels about it. He will still choose those white supremacist over you if it all came down to it because again he’s made it clear that’s how he roles.

If you don’t believe that, then look at who his wife is and what she’s done.

You’re staying hung up on defending him. I’m not defending him at all.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

So what you're saying is, you're okay with cacs calling him a n*gger?

Is that what I said as I specifically called that out in other threads previously saying that shyt shouldn’t fly. Don’t make assumptions when receipts can easily be pulled proving otherwise.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

You’re staying hung up on defending him. I’m not defending him at all.

You keep saying a black man when we’re specifically referring to one in particular with Clarence Thomas. The word scapegoat shouldn’t be used at all because even Clarence Thomas doesn’t qualify as that because of his tenure in the SC. Once again, he is perfectly fine with being front and center with this issue.

This isn‘t a general debate as one person in particular is being referred to.

 

[TELL ME YA CHEESIN FAM?]

Is that what I said as I specifically called that out in other threads previously saying that shyt shouldn’t fly. Don’t make assumptions when receipts can easily be pulled proving otherwise.

That's also what's Martha is calling him breh
Read between the lines

 

[High Art]

Martha out here talking with the same slickness that some white women talk with after they've fukked a black guy or two and I don't care for it. You know what I'm talking about.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

That's also what's Martha is calling him breh
Read between the lines

Where in my comment did I defend what Martha Stewart said? What I said specifically is that I'm not going to rush to defend Clarence Thomas because he could care less about people who look like and if you don't believe that look at who his wife is and the shyt that she's said. He's married to a white supremacist whose family is one themselves and you can read the previous tweet in another thread about what they think of him, yet he still married her and have taken on those attributes as well. That's why a lot of us are not too keen in rushing to his defense.

With that being said, calling him the N word or anything close to it shouldn't fly because all that's going to do is have white people feeling comfortable enough to use those terms again in the future. It's one of the drawbacks of multiple threads been made about the same topic in the same day as people don't read through them before commenting in another thread and make assumptions.

 

[lib123]

You keep saying a black man when we’re specifically referring to one in particular with Clarence Thomas. The word scapegoat shouldn’t be used at all because even Clarence Thomas doesn’t qualify as that because of his tenure in the SC. Once again, he is perfectly fine with being front and center with this issue.

This isn‘t a general debate as one person in particular is being referred to.

Lol do you know how white supremacy works? I’m not condoning Clarence Thomas at all. However, I’m not giving a White woman a pass to determine what qualifies as Blackness. And I’m not ignoring the media’s effort to constantly make Clarence Thomas the face of this decision. White supremacy relies heavily on placing disproportionate blame on Black people. That needs to be checked at all times.

Why aren’t Martha Stewart or the left-wing feminists individually demonizing their fellow white woman justice Amy Barrett? Why isn’t Martha Stewart saying that Amy Barrett doesn’t realize she’s a woman? They stay on code at all times and place blame on Black tokens instead.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

Lol do you know how white supremacy works? I’m not condoning Clarence Thomas at all. However, I’m not giving a White woman a pass to determine what qualifies as Blackness. And I’m not ignoring the media’s effort to constantly make Clarence Thomas the face of this decision. White supremacy relies heavily on placing disproportionate blame on Black people. That needs to be checked at all times.

You're correct that it totally needs to be checked, but it should be acknowledged in this particular instance and not overlooked that Clarence Thomas is married to a white supremacist himself and likely holds those same views himself. Both aspects can be true and in this case it is.

 

[lib123]

You're correct that it totally needs to be checked, but it should be acknowledged in this particular instance and not overlooked that Clarence Thomas is married to a white supremacist himself and likely holds those same views himself. Both aspects can be true and in this case it is.

Not denying that. But again, it’s not Martha Stewart’s place to question anyones Blackness.

 

[Thavoiceofthevoiceless]

Not denying that. But again, it’s not Martha Stewart’s place to question anyones Blackness.

Again I never said that it was her place to question it because it's obviously not. Don't make the assumption that I said it was her place.

All I am and have been saying is that you're going to find out that a lot of people are going to be hard pressed to defend Clarence Thomas from any type of slander because of his spotty history about people who look like him nor does he care to have people defending him anyways. With that being said, comments like this one and the tweet about the N word should be called out and rightfully so.

 

[Henri Christophe]

The liberals in here are sickening letting white people call you racial slurs and telling you to know your place and you just let them